Significance of non-linear terms

anuradha
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
hi,
Do the addition of non-linear terms in action play any significant role in string theory??
if so, what is its significance in string cosmology?

---
anuradha
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you talking about the action of the fundamental strings, or about the action of low-energy effective field theory that results from string theory?
 
Dear anuradha,

Well the Nambu-Goto action is itself non-polynomial - because of the square-root. In the Nambu-Goto formalism, there is a topological term that we can add - the self-linking number. It is non-linear. But I have never seen a quantisation of the Nambu-Goto action with this knot theory topological term included.

On the other hand, I am not aware of any such topological term constructed from the X^mu, that measures knottedness in the Polyakov framework. Presumably if such a term exists - then it must be non-linear.

I would expect such terms to affect the compact extra dimensions because such terms imply highly non-trivial world-sheet topology and one must use the theory of Algebraic Surfaces and NOT merely Riemann Surfaces.

From the cosmology point of view - a new constraint on the compact extra dimensions will make the Landscape smaller...

Best Regards
Alwi
 
Demystifier said:
Are you talking about the action of the fundamental strings, or about the action of low-energy effective field theory that results from string theory?
thank you for your reply.
let me make it more clear!
see for eg: if the action is S=int{d^4x*(L_d+k*L_d^2)}, where L_d characterises the lagrangian density of the fermionic field and k being some constant(to make correct dimensionality)...by adding L_d^2 , S contains a non-linear term, right?
i am talking about such a field...does it hold any physical significance to string cosmology??
or does the L_d^2 term belong to string inspired cosmology??if so what may be its relevance??


hope you got my question!
-anuradha
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...

Similar threads

Back
Top