Silly question about units of Momentum Density from NG Action

benbenny
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Ok, I am thinking that I should probably move this to the Coursework area. I am not sure how to do that or if I even can...

My bad...Excuse the question but I am stuck on this for the past hour.

I studying Zweibach's "A first Course in String Theory". From the Nambu-Goto Action he derives the wave equation which consists of the term

\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \dot{X} ^{\mu}} &= -\frac{T_{0}}{c}\frac{\dot{X} \cdot X')X'_{\mu}-(x')^{2}\dot{X}_{\mu}} {\sqrt{(\dot{X} \cdot X')^{2} - (\dot{X})^{2}(X')^{2}}} \equiv \mathcal{P}^{\tau}_{\mu}

Now this \mathcal{P}^{\tau}_{\mu} is referred to as the momentum density and is used as such later on in the book:

p_\mu(\tau) = \int ^{\sigma _{1}}_{0} \mathcal{P}^{\tau}_{\mu}(\tau , \sigma) d\sigma

Im confused because I would expect \mathcal{P}^{\tau}_{\mu} to have units of Mass divided by time, if \sigma has units of length, or units of momentum, if \sigma is dimensionless, so that when you integrate over \sigma you get units of momentum.

But as far as I can see \mathcal{P}^{\tau}_{\mu} has units of mass times length. I get this becuase the lagrangian density has units of ML^2/T and it is differentiated with respect to velocity, thus it takes units of ML.

Can someone help with this?

Thanks.

B
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Correct me if I'm wrong, but since you're not doing functional differentiation, I expect your L to be the Lagranian density in one dimension. Since a string is one-dimensional, this is

energy/length = (ML^2/T^2)/L = ML/T^2

The differentiated L on your left (momentum density) side would then have dimension

(ML/T^2) / (L/T) = M/T

Total momentum, integrated along the string length would have dimension

(M/T)*L = M*L/T

which seems right, knowing that momentum can be expressed as mass*velocity.

Torquil
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...
Back
Top