Silly Question.. Learning the names of properties

  • Thread starter Thread starter kamalayka
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Properties
AI Thread Summary
Self-studying basic mathematics, including algebra, geometry, trigonometry, and calculus, has led to a concern about not knowing the formal terminology for various properties and axioms. Understanding the logic behind mathematical concepts is crucial, but familiarity with terms like associativity, commutativity, and distributivity is also important, especially for a math major. While it's beneficial to learn these names, the emphasis should be on understanding and applying the properties themselves. Engaging in university courses and discussions with peers and professors will naturally enhance familiarity with mathematical terminology. It's acknowledged that asking questions about these concerns is valid and that memorizing every property is unnecessary; understanding their application is key.
kamalayka
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Over the past couple years, I have self-studied all of the basic mathematics (algebra, geometry, trigonometry, and calculus).

When learning something new, my approach has always been to understand the underlying logic of why I was doing what I did.

I have a bit of a proble, however. I never took the time to learn the "formal" terminology used for various properties amd axioms.

Example: in algebra, there is the property a(b+c) = ab + ac. I know this intuitively, but I can't remember the name of it. (I had to Google it to find out it's called the distributive property.)

Here is my question:

If I want to be a math major, should I go back through all the math textbooks I have and learn the names of these things? (I know it's a silly question, but it's really bugging me.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's important to know the names of properties like associativity, commutativity, distributivity, and so on, because they are ubiquitous throughout mathematics. However, it's much more important to know the properties themselves. In any case, as you continue to study mathematics, you will encounter and use these terms so often that they will become second nature.
 
The names of these properties become important shorthand when you start doing mathematical proofs. However, I think you will learn them quite easily once you study abstract algebra and linear algebra, where they really come into full play.
 
Getting a degree in math requires going to a university and take math courses - not only to self-study. Going to university usually involves talking with other people, professors and especially fellow students. Like any other language, scientific terminology is best learned by actually using it. You will get familiar with the terminology more or less automatically. You shouldn't worry about this, now.

EDIT: Oh, and for the record: I find this a perfectly valid concern/question, not a silly one.
 
kamalayka said:
If I want to be a math major, should I go back through all the math textbooks I have and learn the names of these things? (I know it's a silly question, but it's really bugging me.)

This isn't really a silly question, there is no such thing! If you are curious about something, then you should always ask questions, no matter how redundant they may seem.

I'm sure you won't have to look through every math textbook, as long as you understand the properties and know how to apply them, then you should be fine. It is, however, important to know how to use them in certain situations. (Which I'm sure you know how to do.)

Also, since there are so many different properties, I guarantee you that you won't be able to memorize every single one of them. :-p
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top