MHB Similar Matrices: Are Eigenvalues the Same?

AI Thread Summary
If matrices A and B are similar, they share the same eigenvalues, but the converse is not necessarily true. An example demonstrates that matrices can have the same eigenvalue without being similar. Specifically, while matrix A has a repeated eigenvalue of 1, matrix B has eigenvalues of 1 and -1, showing they are not similar. Additionally, matrix C shares the same repeated eigenvalue with A but is also not similar to it. Thus, having the same eigenvalues does not imply similarity between matrices.
Sudharaka
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,558
Reaction score
1
saravananbs's question from Math Help Forum,

if A and B are similar matrices then the eigenvalues are same. is the converse is true? why?
thank u

Hi saravananbs,

No. The converse is not true in general. Take the two matrices, \(A=\begin{pmatrix}1 & 0\\0 & 1\end{pmatrix}\mbox{ and }B=\begin{pmatrix}0 & 1\\1 & 0\end{pmatrix}\).

\[\begin{pmatrix}1 & 0\\0 & 1\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}1 \\ 1\end{pmatrix}=1.\begin{pmatrix}1 \\ 1\end{pmatrix}\]

\[\begin{pmatrix}0 & 1\\1 & 0\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}1 \\ 1\end{pmatrix}=1.\begin{pmatrix}1 \\ 1\end{pmatrix}\]

Therefore both matrices have the same eigenvalue 1. However it can be easily shown that \(A\mbox{ and }B\) are not similar matrices.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Sudharaka said:
saravananbs's question from Math Help Forum,
Hi saravananbs,

No. The converse is not true in general. Take the two matrices, \(A=\begin{pmatrix}1 & 0\\0 & 1\end{pmatrix}\mbox{ and }B=\begin{pmatrix}0 & 1\\1 & 0\end{pmatrix}\).

\[\begin{pmatrix}1 & 0\\0 & 1\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}1 \\ 1\end{pmatrix}=1.\begin{pmatrix}1 \\ 1\end{pmatrix}\]

\[\begin{pmatrix}0 & 1\\1 & 0\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}1 \\ 1\end{pmatrix}=1.\begin{pmatrix}1 \\ 1\end{pmatrix}\]

Therefore both matrices have the same eigenvalue 1. However it can be easily shown that \(A\mbox{ and }B\) are not similar matrices.
That example does not really work, because $A$ and $B$ do not have the same eigenvalues: $A$ has a (repeated) eigenvalue 1, whereas the eigenvalues of $B$ are 1 and –1.

However, if $C = \begin{pmatrix}1 & 1 \\0 & 1\end{pmatrix}$, then $A$ and $C$ have the same eigenvalues (namely 1, repeated), but are not similar.
 
Opalg said:
That example does not really work, because $A$ and $B$ do not have the same eigenvalues: $A$ has a (repeated) eigenvalue 1, whereas the eigenvalues of $B$ are 1 and –1.

However, if $C = \begin{pmatrix}1 & 1 \\0 & 1\end{pmatrix}$, then $A$ and $C$ have the same eigenvalues (namely 1, repeated), but are not similar.

Thanks for correcting that. Of course I now see that only the eigenvalue 1 is common to both \(A\) and \(B\).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top