A Similarity in form of time-evolution and Gibbs weight?

muscaria
Messages
125
Reaction score
29
Why do the time-evolution operator in quantum mechanics ##\exp{iHt}## and the Gibbs-weight operator in statistical physics ##\exp{-H/T}## have the same functional form? – i.e. both exponentials of the Hamiltonian operator.
The Matsubara trick/method just takes this as a fact in thermal QFT; but one might wonder whether there’s a deeper reason why these two operators (with apparently different physical meanings) look so similar. My feeling is that it is related to generating functions in some way, but not sure how.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The time evolution operator for states in the Schrödinger picture is
$$\hat{U}=\exp(-\mathrm{i} \hat{H} t).$$
This is due to the equations of motion of QT.

The statistical operator in the canonical ensemble is
$$\hat{\rho}(T)=\frac{1}{Z} \exp(-\beta \hat{H}),$$
where ##\beta=1/T## is the inverse temperature due to the maximum-entropy principle for the case that the average energy of the system is given. ##\beta## is the Lagrange parameter for this constraint.

It's just luck that both operators are so similar, and you can do perturbation theory along the Matsubara temperature to calculate finite-temperature QFT almost as in vacuum QFT. However in thermal field theory you have (anti-)periodic boundary conditions for the field operators, so that instead of an energy integral in the vacuum QFT you have the sum over the Matsubara frequency in thermal QFT. For more details, see

http://th.physik.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/publ/off-eq-qft.pdf
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top