Simple algebra problem, what am I doing wrong?

  • Thread starter Thread starter uperkurk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra
AI Thread Summary
The algebra problem presented is (x+2)-(3x-2)=x+3, which simplifies incorrectly in the initial steps. The correct simplification leads to -2x + 4 = x + 3, not 2x + 4 = x + 3. The mistake was in miscalculating the coefficients when combining like terms. The correct solution shows that x equals 1/3, as confirmed by Wolfram. The discussion highlights the importance of careful algebraic manipulation to avoid errors.
uperkurk
Messages
167
Reaction score
0
(x+2)-(3x-2)=x+3
2x+4=x+3
x+4=3
x=-1

but wolfram says the answer is x=\frac{1}{3}

I can't see where I went wrong.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The second line is ##-2x + 4 = x + 3##.
##x - 3x = -2x##, not ##2x##.
 
LastOneStanding said:
The second line is ##-2x + 4 = x + 3##.
##x - 3x = -2x##, not ##2x##.

oh, clumsy error from me. Thanks.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top