Simple Beam Problem: Solving for Vertical Forces and Symmetry in Mechanics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Demian^^
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a mechanics problem involving a two-dimensional beam subjected to a constant downward force and supported by four vertical points. The original poster is attempting to analyze the forces acting on the beam while considering its symmetry and equilibrium conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the conditions of static equilibrium (Sum_verticals=0 and Sum_Moments=0) but finds that they lead to a relationship between the remaining unknown forces. They question whether this indicates a degree of freedom that complicates the solution.
  • Some participants suggest considering the implications of symmetry and the nature of the forces exerted by the supports, raising questions about the adequacy of the problem's simplifications.
  • Others propose the idea of introducing additional equations based on the assumption that the supporting points would exert equal forces under repeated conditions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the implications of the assumptions made in the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of hyperstatic systems and the need for additional relations to fully solve the problem. There is no explicit consensus on the best approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem may be oversimplified and that additional factors could influence the forces acting on the beam. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the physicality of the situation, indicating a need for further exploration of the assumptions involved.

Demian^^
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to refresh my mechanics by solving some fairly simple, self invented, beam problems. This goes fine, but I can't figure out how to solve the following one.. it sounds simple enough, though..
Imagine a (two dimensional) beam of size d with a vertical outside distributed constant downward force acting on it (for instance gravity).
It is supported by four points that can exert a vertical force on the beam, to keep it in balance. They are placed completely symmetrical: two of them at the outsides of the beam and two at a distance, for instance, d/10 away from the center of the beam. Their forces can be named Va,Vb,Vc,Vd or something. When i use the symmetric properties I can reduce the number of unknowns to two, but then I'm stuck. I can use Sum_verticals=0 and Sum_Moments=0, but they both give the same relation between the two unknowns that are left over.
Is there a fundamental reason why this cannot be solved this way? Does the outcome mean that there is in fact one degree of freedom left? This does not sound very physical, as I can imagine that the forces exerted by the points on the beam will always be the same in a true situation.
Could anyone help me on this one? I'm probably making some very stupid mistakes.
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about it: Imagine four people carrying a huge log, distributed as you have stated. Now, without changing any of the positions of the vertical supports, one of the guys in the middle could ease up on his lifting (thus increasing the load on the others) or he could lift harder (decreasing the load on the others). Can you see why there isn't enough information to solve this?
 
Yes, I'd figured that out, more or less. I wonder, however, if I could add extra equations to solve the problem. If my intuition is right and all the supporting points are equal, then it sounds logical that everytime you would repeat the experiment, they would exert the same reaction force and not suddenly the two middlepoints each 5N more and the outer ones 5N less. So I assume the problem as stated here is too 'simplified' and there are other factors that play a role?
(Thanks for the reply!)
 
Well the system you described is an Hyperstatic system of degree one. It can't be solved only by the equations of static. You need also forces-displacement relations (constitutive equations and compatibility equations).

Check https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=80873" for more information.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K