Simple combinatorics about an 8 MegaPixel shot

  • Thread starter Thread starter x2thay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Combinatorics
AI Thread Summary
An 8-megapixel image, with a resolution of 3264x2448, can produce an astronomical number of possible photographs, calculated as 16777216 raised to the power of 7990272 pixels. This results in approximately 1.23X10^57727477 unique images, encompassing every conceivable visual representation, including all subjects, angles, and distortions. The discussion highlights the mind-boggling implications of this vast combination space, suggesting it includes every possible image, text, and even future media. Despite the immense possibilities, the majority of generated images are likely to be meaningless noise. This exploration raises intriguing parallels to concepts like phase space in theoretical contexts.
x2thay
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hello there,

So consider an 8 megapixel picture (res: 3264x2448).
Now, it seems rather simple but I just can't figure out how to calculate the entire number of possible shots/photographs one can take within that resolution, assuming each pixel can have 16777216 different values/colors.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
x2thay said:
So consider an 8 megapixel picture (res: 3264x2448).
Now, it seems rather simple but I just can't figure out how to calculate the entire number of possible shots/photographs one can take within that resolution, assuming each pixel can have 16777216 different values/colors.

How many possibilities for a 1 pixel picture?
How many possibilities for a 2 pixel picture?
How many possibilities for a 3 pixel picture?
Can you generalize to n pixels?
 
You have 7990272 pixels, each of which can have 16777216 values.

If you string the pixels out in a line, then it is like an odometer with 7990272 wheels and each wheel has 16777216 numbers on it.

So the base of this odometer is base 16777216 and the number you want has "16777216" (the largest "digit" in this base) in each position, and there are 7990272 positions with this "digit" in the number.

So the number you want is the base raised to the power of the number of pixels:

16777216^7990272

Wolfram says in base 10 it would be about 1.23X10^57727477

This is kind of a neat problem because the images include all possible images, all possible zooms in and out to any arbitrary degree, all possible angles, all possible distortions, of all possible subjects, backgrounds, compositions, scales, etc. Pretty mind boggling.
 
bahamagreen said:
This is kind of a neat problem because the images include all possible images, all possible zooms in and out to any arbitrary degree, all possible angles, all possible distortions, of all possible subjects, backgrounds, compositions, scales, etc. Pretty mind boggling.

It also contains all the faces of all the people who ever lived and who ever will live!
 
Yes, plus all the faces of every creature including every alien race in all the inhabited places in the history of the universe.

And if you scroll through it in the right order, it shows everything ever written, or yet to be written, in every font, includes every formula, derivation, graph, proof, and sequence.

If you scrolled through it in the right order at a fast enough presentation of images, it would also show every movie and TV show ever made, including out takes, and different variations on plots. etc.

A question that is suggesting itself to me...

Doesn't this seem to be similar to the concept of phase space?

Or as expressed in the eight postulate of "It's Easy" by the Beatles: "Nothing you can see that isn't shown"
 
Last edited:
The vast majority of these images will all be senseless noise, though.
 
fortissimo said:
The vast majority of these images will all be senseless noise, though.

Or will they? Dun dun duuuuuuuun...
 
fortissimo said:
The vast majority of these images will all be senseless noise, though.

OK, I did the test and I generated a random image. I got the following:

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTIdJiiCUhJ2WZRnFLvQiFgD4ynv7FI0BJxENb--tjqq7kKkttu5g.jpg


So it seems you're right. We do get senseless noise.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
13K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Back
Top