Simple Complex Vector Space Proof Clarification

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
RJLiberator
Gold Member
Messages
1,094
Reaction score
63

Homework Statement


Let v ∈ V and c ∈ ℂ, with c ≠ 0. Prove that if cv = 0, then v = 0.

Homework Equations


Vector space axioms.

The Attempt at a Solution



Simple proof overall, but I have one major clarification question.

v = 1v
= (c^(-1)c)v
= c^(-1) (cv)
= c^(-1) 0
v
= 0

My question is, in a complex vector space, is it safe to assume that c^(-1) exists in this proof?
If it does, I feel very confident about this proof.
If it doesn't then I need to do something else.

I don't see anywhere in the vector space axioms that states the multiplicative inverse exists.
But, it makes sense to me that an inverse does exist for any possible scalar choice here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RJLiberator said:
But, it makes sense to me that an inverse does exist for any possible scalar choice here.

Yes indeed, because ##\mathbb{C}## is a field. More generally, one always speaks of a vector space over a field. (Real and complex numbers are the common choices, but there are others.) So the existence of ##\mathbb{c}^{-1}## for ##\mathbb{c} \neq 0## really follows from the field axioms, not from the vector space axioms.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RJLiberator
Beautiful! I was searching the vector space axioms and had them in my head. The field axioms clearly state this.

thank you, once again, Krylov.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: S.G. Janssens