Simple counterexample for claim about integral domains

In summary, the conversation was about finding an example of an infinite integral domain with finite characteristic. The person was looking for a simple counterexample and suggested using a polynomial ring with coefficients from a finite ring. Another person mentioned the idea of an algebraic closure of a field and how it is infinite with finite characteristic. They also discussed how the polynomial ring idea should have been something that could be thought of without it being formally introduced.
  • #1
SiddharthM
176
0
So I'm looking for an example of an infinite integral domain with finite characterestic. That is a infinite integral domain such that there is a prime p such that p copies of any element added together is the additive identity.

I'm just looking for a simple counterexample. I'm working through Herstein's (Topics..) Ring chapter and this is the problem set after chapter 3.2.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Think about, for example, polynomial rings.
 
  • #3
take the finite ring J_17 (addition mod 17 and multiplication mod 17). Consider the set of polynomials in one variable X (which, say, runs through the real line) with coefficients from J_17. This set of polynomials is a ring: all the ring axioms can be verified using the fact that J_17 is a ring and that the reals form a ring as well. This polynomial ring is clearly finite. Take any polynomial and add 17 copies of it together and we'll be able to collect terms with similar coefficients, since for any element,a, in J_17, 17a=0 we get that adding 17 copies of any such polynomial gives us the zero polynomial.

The idea of a polynomial ring was not introduced before this problem set. What does the variable X traditionally vary over? Does it matter?
 
  • #4
Don't think of it as a variable. It is commonly called an 'indeterminate'. It isn't varying over anything.

How about an algebraic closure of F_p? By the way, why are you looking for a *counter*-example?
 
  • #5
i was going to state the false claim: integral domains of finite characteristic are finite.

An indeterminate, ok.

I presume F_p is the field of 0,1,...,p-1 where addition is modp and similarly for multiplication. If you could elaborate as to 1. what the algebraic closure of F_p is, 2. how it is infinite and 3. how it has finite characteristic.

I haven't been formally introduced to algebraic closures or polynomial rings as yet in Herstein yet I'm expected to come up with this example. There must be something simpler...or maybe not.

Thanks for the help.
 
  • #6
An algebraic closure F of F_p is a minimal field containing F_p, so it necessarily has finite characteristic p, and such that every polynomial with coefficients in F has a root in F.

It is easy to show that no field F_q where q=p^r is algebraically closed (you should try this - hint the non zero elements a a group of order p^r - 1).

Thus if such a thing as an algebraic closure exists, it is infinite.

Anyway, that is probably beyond what you were expected to know.

Since we don't necessarily know what is in Herstein, we cannot say what you're supposed to know or not, but the polynomial ring idea should have been something you can come up with. Just because it is not formally introduced yet doesn't mean you weren't supposed to come up with something like that. After all, you knew what polynomials are before starting book, right?
 
  • #7
word
 

Related to Simple counterexample for claim about integral domains

What is a simple counterexample for the claim that all integral domains are fields?

A simple counterexample for this claim is the integral domain Z, the set of all integers. This is not a field because not all elements have a multiplicative inverse. For example, 2 does not have a multiplicative inverse in Z.

Can you provide a visual representation of a simple counterexample for this claim?

Yes, a visual representation of the integral domain Z as a simple counterexample for the claim can be seen on a number line. The integers are represented as points on the line, with the distance between each point representing a difference of 1. The lack of multiplicative inverses can be seen by the absence of a point directly opposite each integer.

Why is the concept of integral domains important in mathematics?

Integral domains are important in mathematics because they provide a generalization of the concept of a field. They are algebraic structures that have many of the same properties as fields, but do not necessarily have multiplicative inverses for all elements. This allows for a broader understanding of mathematical concepts and structures.

What are some other common counterexamples to claims about integral domains?

Other common counterexamples to claims about integral domains include the ring of polynomials with real coefficients and the set of all 2x2 matrices with real entries. These structures do not have multiplicative inverses for all elements, making them integral domains but not fields.

What are some real-world applications of integral domains?

Integral domains have many real-world applications in areas such as cryptography, coding theory, and computer science. They are also used in abstract algebra to study other mathematical structures, such as rings and fields. Additionally, integral domains are important in number theory, where they are used to study prime numbers and factorization.

Similar threads

  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
3
Replies
84
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
66
Views
4K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
17
Views
4K
Back
Top