Simple derivation: sphere contracting under gravity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the volume reduction rate of a contracting sphere under gravity as stated by Roger Penrose. The volume of a sphere is given by 4/3πr³, leading to a derivative dV/dr of 4πr². The gravitational acceleration is expressed as GM/r², and the participant seeks to understand how to combine these concepts using the chain rule. They recognize that multiplying dV/dr by the gravitational acceleration yields the correct result of 4πGM but are unsure of the mathematical justification for this operation. Clarification on the validity of applying the chain rule in this context is requested.
HowardTheDuck
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Hi Guys, I'm reading Roger Penrose's book "The Road to Reality" at the moment and I wonder if you could help me out with a pretty simple derivation which he doesn't describe in complete detail.
On page 399 he considers a sphere of mass contracting under gravity, and says "The rate of volume reduction is 4πGM". Can you help me derive this, please? It shouldn't be too difficult, it's just beyond me!

OK, what do we know. The volume of a sphere is 4/3πr3. So dV/dr is 4πr2.
And the acceleration (d2r/dt2) due to Newton's law of gravity would be GM/r2. Can we combine these via the chain rule or similar to get the rate (acceleration?) of volume reduction equal to 4πGM.

Thanks a lot.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I can see that if you simply multiply the 4πr2 by the GM/r2 then you get the right answer. But I don't see how that's a valid thing to do.
I don't see how it's valid to multiply dV/dr by d2r/dt2 (by the chain rule?) to get the right answer.
Any help appreciated.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Back
Top