Simple Diffraction: Deriving Equations with Phasors

  • Thread starter Thread starter Manchot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diffraction
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the equation for single-slit Fraunhofer diffraction using phasors, where a participant encountered a discrepancy involving a factor of the slit width, 'a'. They noted an integration error in the Wikipedia result, specifically in how the factor of 'a' was introduced in the denominator. Another participant confirmed that the correct approach should involve integrating with respect to 'x' instead of 'x-prime', leading to a proper Fourier integral. The correct result should yield a sinc function, highlighting the importance of careful variable management in the derivation process. The conversation emphasizes the need for precision in mathematical derivations related to diffraction.
Manchot
Messages
470
Reaction score
5
Hello, I've recently been studying simple diffraction for an upcoming proficiency test, and in the lecture notes for the class, a simple equation regarding single-slit Fraunhoffer diffraction was derived. The derivation was a little weird, so as an exercise, I just decided to go ahead and use phasors to derive the formula myself. Anyway, when I was finished, I nearly had the exact same result as the notes, except for one thing: a factor of a, the width of the slit. Because I couldn't find my mistake anywhere, I decided to look up the result on Wikipedia, which I suspected would do it the same way that I did. Anyway, in the step where the factor of a in the denominator was introduced, there seems to be an integration error. Am I just missing something here?

= C \int_{-\frac{a}{2}}^{\frac{a}{2}}e^\frac{ikxx^\prime}{z} \,dx^\prime<br /> =C \frac{\left(e^\frac{ikax}{2z} - e^\frac{-ikax}{2z}\right)}{\frac{2ikax}{2z}}
 
Science news on Phys.org
where do you think there is a mistake ?

marlon
 
Looks to me like they snuck in that factor of a in the denominator where it doesn't belong.
 
you are right Doc Al

i did not even see that...i must be getting delirious again

marlon
 
In my notes, the LHS should be;

C \int_{-\frac{a}{2}}^{\frac{a}{2}}e^{ikxsin\theta} dx

Which is just a Fourier integral (u = xsin\theta is the conjugate variable), whereby the correct result is the sinc function given.

It would appear that you should be integrating with respect to x rather than x-prime.

Claude.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K