Simple Diffraction: Deriving Equations with Phasors

  • Thread starter Thread starter Manchot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diffraction
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of the single-slit Fraunhofer diffraction equation using phasors. A participant identified an integration error involving a factor of 'a', the width of the slit, in the denominator of the equation. The correct approach involves integrating with respect to 'x' rather than 'x-prime', leading to the proper formulation of the sinc function. This highlights the importance of careful variable management in Fourier integrals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of single-slit Fraunhofer diffraction
  • Familiarity with phasor representation in wave physics
  • Knowledge of Fourier integrals and their applications
  • Basic calculus, particularly integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the single-slit Fraunhofer diffraction equation
  • Learn about the properties and applications of the sinc function
  • Explore phasor analysis in wave mechanics
  • Review integration techniques in the context of Fourier transforms
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for proficiency tests in physics, educators teaching wave optics, and researchers interested in diffraction phenomena.

Manchot
Messages
470
Reaction score
5
Hello, I've recently been studying simple diffraction for an upcoming proficiency test, and in the lecture notes for the class, a simple equation regarding single-slit Fraunhoffer diffraction was derived. The derivation was a little weird, so as an exercise, I just decided to go ahead and use phasors to derive the formula myself. Anyway, when I was finished, I nearly had the exact same result as the notes, except for one thing: a factor of a, the width of the slit. Because I couldn't find my mistake anywhere, I decided to look up the result on Wikipedia, which I suspected would do it the same way that I did. Anyway, in the step where the factor of a in the denominator was introduced, there seems to be an integration error. Am I just missing something here?

= C \int_{-\frac{a}{2}}^{\frac{a}{2}}e^\frac{ikxx^\prime}{z} \,dx^\prime<br /> =C \frac{\left(e^\frac{ikax}{2z} - e^\frac{-ikax}{2z}\right)}{\frac{2ikax}{2z}}
 
Science news on Phys.org
where do you think there is a mistake ?

marlon
 
Looks to me like they snuck in that factor of a in the denominator where it doesn't belong.
 
you are right Doc Al

i did not even see that...i must be getting delirious again

marlon
 
In my notes, the LHS should be;

C \int_{-\frac{a}{2}}^{\frac{a}{2}}e^{ikxsin\theta} dx

Which is just a Fourier integral (u = xsin\theta is the conjugate variable), whereby the correct result is the sinc function given.

It would appear that you should be integrating with respect to x rather than x-prime.

Claude.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K