Single Slit Fraunhofer Diffraction

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the topic of single slit Fraunhofer diffraction, specifically focusing on the mathematical formulation of irradiance as a plane wave encounters a slit. Participants explore the implications of assumptions regarding the uniformity of illumination and the effects of slit thickness on diffraction patterns.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks to derive the formula for irradiance, suggesting it is similar to I=I_0\left(\frac{\sin(\beta/2)}{\beta/2}\right)^2, where \beta is defined in terms of the slit width and angle.
  • Another participant points out that the standard formula may not account for the non-uniform illumination across the slit, suggesting that the profile should be included in the analysis.
  • A later reply questions whether the assumption of a coherent plane wave specifies the illumination profile, and requests clarification on how to derive the relationship from the integral to the sine function.
  • Concerns are raised about the practical implications of a finite thickness slit, noting that it could affect luminosity distribution due to induced currents in the material, particularly if it is metallic.
  • One participant proposes that the problem of a narrow slit might be better approached from the perspective of a microwave slot antenna rather than as a limiting case of a wide slit.
  • A participant mentions finding a solution in a book on Optics, indicating they were able to replicate results using familiar notation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the assumptions regarding the uniformity of illumination and the effects of slit thickness, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the uniformity of the incident wave and the effects of slit thickness on diffraction patterns, which are not fully resolved in the discussion.

Daniel Gallimore
Messages
48
Reaction score
17
Just to clarify, this isn't homework. I took an Optics course a few years ago, but in the time between then and now, I've lost all my notes.

Suppose we have an infinitely tall slit of width a and a parallel screen a distance r_0 away. Let the x axis be parallel to the width of the slit, with the origin at the center of the slit (such that the slit extends from x=-a/2 to x=a/2). The z axis extends toward the screen from the origin. An angle \theta locates a point P on the screen (with respect to the z axis) a distance x=X along the screen. A ray drawn from the origin to P is length r.

Given a plane wave incident on the slit, what is the formula for the irradiance of the diffracted wave as it encounters the screen?

I know the answer is similar (if not equal to) I=I_0\left(\frac{\sin(\beta/2)}{\beta/2}\right)^2 where \beta\equiv ka\sin\theta I also know that E=-\frac{ikE_0}{2\pi r_0}\int_{-a/2}^{a/2} e^{ikr} \, dx To get from the electric field to the irradiance is not a problem.

Any recommendations?
 
Science news on Phys.org
This is the standard formula, I think. The problem is with the limits of the integral. For a real case and a narrow slit, the illumination across the slit is not uniform so the profile should be included in the formula.
 
sophiecentaur said:
This is the standard formula, I think. The problem is with the limits of the integral. For a real case and a narrow slit, the illumination across the slit is not uniform so the profile should be included in the formula.
Does saying the incident wave is a (coherent) plane wave not specify the profile? If not, please assume the illumination is uniform across the width of the slit. Also, I know this is just a toy example, but I'd like to get it down before tackling anything more realistic, like a nonuniform incident wave front.

What I want to know is how to get from the integral to to the \sin(\beta/2)/(\beta/2) function. And if the integral is incorrect, I need some pointers to correct it.
 
Daniel Gallimore said:
If not, please assume the illumination is uniform across the width of the slit
If you assume that, then no problem. But a slit in a screen of finite, practical thickness could be several wavelengths deep and, depending on the material (say metal) it will definitely affect the distribution of luminosity at the way out of a narrow slit. It just depends on how far you want to go, I think. Thinking in terms of a microwave slot through a thick sheet of metal, there will be induced currents around the edges of the slit which will alter the effective width.
Imo, the problem of a narrow slit would probably be best approached not as the limiting case of a wide slit but rather as a microwave slot antenna.
 
sophiecentaur said:
If you assume that, then no problem. But a slit in a screen of finite, practical thickness could be several wavelengths deep and, depending on the material (say metal) it will definitely affect the distribution of luminosity at the way out of a narrow slit. It just depends on how far you want to go, I think. Thinking in terms of a microwave slot through a thick sheet of metal, there will be induced currents around the edges of the slit which will alter the effective width.
Imo, the problem of a narrow slit would probably be best approached not as the limiting case of a wide slit but rather as a microwave slot antenna.
I found a working of the problem in a book on Optics and was able to replicate the result in notation that was more familiar to me.

Thank you for your comments.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K