Simple Integral Help: Evaluate x^2*ln(x)dx

  • Thread starter Thread starter ebk11
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral of x^2 * ln(x) can be evaluated using integration by parts. The correct substitution involves letting u = ln(x) and dv = x^2 dx, leading to du = (1/x) dx and v = (1/3)x^3. The final result of the integral is (1/3)x^3 * ln(x) - (1/9)x^3 + C, confirming the proper application of integration techniques.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integration by parts
  • Familiarity with logarithmic functions
  • Knowledge of basic calculus concepts
  • Ability to differentiate and integrate polynomial functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of integration by parts in detail
  • Practice evaluating integrals involving logarithmic and polynomial functions
  • Learn about the properties of logarithms in calculus
  • Explore advanced integration techniques such as substitution and partial fractions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on integration techniques, as well as educators looking for examples of integration by parts applications.

ebk11
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Evaluate the following integral:

[integral](x^2)*ln(x)dx

Homework Equations



I believe this is substitution by parts...

The Attempt at a Solution



I chose u = ln(x), and dv = x^2. The problem I am having is I can't figure out what du and v should be, because I am thinking too much and confusing myself. If u = ln(x), then du should simply be 1/x, right? And if dv = x^2, then to get v, you just need the integral of x^2, which is just 2x. Is that right?

If those are right, then how come I come up with the following answer, which I don't believe is right (and I will laugh if it is but I really don't think so):

2x*lnx - 2x + C

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The INTEGRAL of x^2 isn't 2x.
 
ebk11 said:
And if dv = x^2, then to get v, you just need the integral of x^2, which is just 2x. Is that right?

No. You have differentiated, not integrated.
 
Well that's what I was confused about.

When you are setting up a substitution by parts problem...when you get u, you differentiate to get the du...and then you integrate to get v from dv, right?

So it should be x^3/3, not 2x?
 
ebk11 said:
So it should be x^3/3, not 2x?

Correct. Technically speaking you'd have:

u = ln x
dv = x2 dx
 
fss said:
Correct. Technically speaking you'd have:

u = ln x
dv = x2 dx

Okay, so I got du = 1/xdx, and v = x^3/3

Then, I did: lnx * x^3/3 - [integral]x^3/3 * 1/xdx

then: lnx * 1/3*x^3 - 1/3[integral]x^3/xdx

which simplifies to: lnx * 1/3 * x^3 - 1/3[integral]x^2dx

which is: lnx * 1/3 * x^3 - 1/3[integral]x^3/3 + C

final answer: ln(x) * 1/3 * x^3 - 1/9 * x^3 + C

Does that seem right?

Thanks in advance for reading this all over...
 
Looks like you got it to me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
7K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
15K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K