Simple L-R Circuit Tutorial

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jeffer vitola
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Tutorial
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

This discussion revolves around a tutorial on L-R circuits, focusing on contributions, comments, and the use of LaTeX for mathematical expressions. Participants share their thoughts on the tutorial's presentation and the importance of clarity in communication, particularly in a multilingual context.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a willingness to share solutions but struggles with using LaTeX, opting instead for images of handwritten solutions.
  • Another participant encourages the use of LaTeX for clarity and aesthetics in posts, suggesting that it enhances the reading experience.
  • Concerns are raised about the use of Spanish in posts, emphasizing the need for contributions to be in English to maintain community coherence.
  • A participant reflects on their intention to improve their English and LaTeX skills while acknowledging the challenges of creating diagrams.
  • There is a discussion about the standards for tutorial topics versus informal sketches, with suggestions that tutorials should be more general before applying to specific problems.
  • Questions arise regarding the inclusion of additional materials, such as scanned sheets, in relation to the original exercise.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the adequacy of visual aids and the standards for tutorial contributions. There is no clear consensus on the best practices for presenting solutions or the necessity of using LaTeX.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note limitations in their ability to create diagrams and use LaTeX, which may affect the quality of their contributions. The discussion also highlights the challenges of communicating effectively in a multilingual forum.

Who May Find This Useful

Members interested in improving their technical communication skills, particularly in the context of physics and engineering tutorials, may find this discussion relevant.

jeffer vitola
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
hello ... I'll put some solution, as I do not drive the latex language, then I take pictures of the leaves with my solutions ... the user who wants to give more solutions is well received and is welcome ...

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/1069View attachment 1070View attachment 1071View attachment 1072
 

Attachments

  • 30.jpg
    30.jpg
    62.8 KB · Views: 189
  • 31.jpg
    31.jpg
    87.7 KB · Views: 205
  • 32.jpg
    32.jpg
    66.6 KB · Views: 203
  • 33.jpg
    33.jpg
    17 KB · Views: 204
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
This thread is for questions and comments pertaining to this tutorial:

http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f49/l-r-circuit-simple-5695/#post26013
 
Re: L-R Circuit Simple

MarkFL said:
Thank you for your contributions to increase our knowledge base here. (Sun)

I just have a couple of comments:

a) I highly recommend that you learn to use $\LaTeX$. It makes such posts much easier to read, and there is a certain amount of satisfaction gained from using it to make nice looking posts. There are tutorials here and online to get you started, and we have a sub-forum here dedicated to the use of $\LaTeX$ in which you can ask questions.

b) While we have an international membership, many of our members do not read Spanish, and we ask that information be given in English, as this is the language of choice here. Thus, contributions to our forums should be made in English, otherwise the ultimate goal of the community ‒ which is, precisely, to be a community ‒ will be lost.
hello ... I accept your criticism and comments, but do circuit drawings or drawings on the approximation of the rectangles double integrals, if They Can not make latex, I have seen a post by the other user approximation on double integrals, and although the user will use latex were ugly drawings seem to use the paint program to make drawings of the comprehensive double rectangles ...
the user petrus with the topic The double rectangle is full of f over R and midpoint rule for double integrals and drawings are not good, not for who are poorly made ​​if not for that look ugly...

I just think if any contribution That'll do better with commentary in English and that I try to do all written in English on that I'm going to improve, and if I can in latex, but I think you have some pictures or symbol invented by me, and I handle some staff notation and mine own symbolism in latex do not think you can do the same ... thanks for your comments and for your criticism,,,,,,thanks

att
jefferson alexander vitola (Smile)
 
Re: L-R Circuit Simple

Hello,

I have moved this post to the commentary thread. The other posts were left because they predate the creation of the commentary thread. We ask that when a tutorial topic is created, a commentary topic is also created, this way comments can be made, but the original tutorial topic is not cluttered with these comments.

jeffer vitola said:
...
the user petrus with the topic The double rectangle is full of f over R and midpoint rule for double integrals and drawings are not good, not for who are poorly made ​​if not for that look ugly...

I just think if any contribution That'll do better with commentary in English and that I try to do all written in English on that I'm going to improve, and if I can in latex, but I think you have some pictures or symbol invented by me, and I handle some staff notation and mine own symbolism in latex do not think you can do the same ... thanks for your comments and for your criticism,,,,,,thanks

att
jefferson alexander vitola (Smile)

Petrus was not creating a tutorial topic, which we hold to higher standards. He simply created a rough sketch which sufficed for the purpose of getting his question answered.

The mathematics can be done using $\LaTeX$ and supporting diagrams can be attached. How you decide to create the diagrams is up to you.

I have no pictures/symbols invented by you...I'm not sure what you mean by this or that I cannot do the same. :confused:

I also recommend if you are going to create tutorial topics, it is best to solve the problem in as general a way as possible, and only then, once the theory has been developed, apply it to specific problems. This is more instructive.
 
Re: L-R Circuit Simple

MarkFL said:
Hello,

I have moved this post to the commentary thread. The other posts were left because they predate the creation of the commentary thread. We ask that when a tutorial topic is created, a commentary topic is also created, this way comments can be made, but the original tutorial topic is not cluttered with these comments.
Petrus was not creating a tutorial topic, which we hold to higher standards. He simply created a rough sketch which sufficed for the purpose of getting his question answered.

The mathematics can be done using $\LaTeX$ and supporting diagrams can be attached. How you decide to create the diagrams is up to you.

I have no pictures/symbols invented by you...I'm not sure what you mean by this or that I cannot do the same. :confused:

I also recommend if you are going to create tutorial topics, it is best to solve the problem in as general a way as possible, and only then, once the theory has been developed, apply it to specific problems. This is more instructive.

hello ... MarkFL wanted to ask in this exercise that I not included the other sheet where I resolved scanned electric charge point at time t, if I scan this one could include in the photos that I gave to principle for the exercise remains continuous all the consecutive sheets, or conversely if I scanned would remain as a separate attachment to what I already I solved the circuit.att
jefferson alexander vitola (Smile)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
38K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
22K