Simple magnetic forces and angular momentum conservation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the behavior of magnetic forces and their implications for angular momentum conservation in a system of two point charges moving with nonparallel velocities. Participants explore the nature of internal torques, the cancellation of forces, and the conservation of momentum in electromagnetic systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about how torques from magnetic forces cancel when two point charges exert equal and opposite forces that are not aligned along the line connecting them.
  • Another participant agrees that nonparallel velocities lead to non-zero net torque due to the Lorentz Force and suggests that radiation from the charges might provide a means to offset this issue.
  • A third participant notes that linear momentum is not conserved in electromagnetic systems unless the momentum of the electric and magnetic fields is included.
  • A later reply references the Trouton-Noble experiment and asserts that while the angular momentum of the charges increases, there is no tendency for rotation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the conservation of angular momentum and the behavior of torques in this context. Multiple competing views remain, particularly concerning the implications of radiation and the inclusion of field momentum.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of the interactions between moving charges and the electromagnetic fields, indicating that assumptions about force directions and conservation laws may need further clarification.

readywil
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I was thinking about internal torques and why they cancel, and I can't figure out how torques from magnetic forces cancel.

Say you have two point charges moving with nonparallel velocities. The magnetic forces they exert on each other are opposite and equal, but they aren't along the line between the two charges, so their torques don't cancel in general.

This is worrying to me because it means that their angular momentum could change without an external force, which seems wrong. Could someone please show me where I'm going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There really shouldn't be a force in any direction other than along the line connecting two particles. But yeah, I get the same thing. If the velocities aren't parallel, I get non-zero net torque on the Lorentz Force.

I'm really not sure what's going on, but keeping in mind that both of these charges are going to be accelerating due to the forces they apply on each other (especially with non-perpendicular velocities) there is also going to be radiation from each of the charges, which might provide recoil sufficient to offset this difference.
 
The linear momentum of the particles in an electromagnetic system is also not conserved, in general. In order to regain conservation of linear and angular momentum, you have to include the linear and angular momentum of the E and B fields themselves.
 
readywil said:
I was thinking about internal torques and why they cancel, and I can't figure out how torques from magnetic forces cancel.

Say you have two point charges moving with nonparallel velocities. The magnetic forces they exert on each other are opposite and equal, but they aren't along the line between the two charges, so their torques don't cancel in general.

This is worrying to me because it means that their angular momentum could change without an external force, which seems wrong. Could someone please show me where I'm going wrong?
You are describing the Trouton-Noble experiment, which tested special relativity.
In fact the angular momentum of the two charges increases, but there is no tendency to rotate.. Try <http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/0603/0603110v3.pdf>
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K