Simple proof of Snell's law without calculus

  • #1
shihab-kol
119
8
Well, I have checked out the ones with calculus but I was just wondering if there was one without calculus
I tried it but could not do it
I think Fermat's principle can be used to do it but I am not being successful
So, anyone please help
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
fresh_42
Mentor
Insights Author
2022 Award
17,645
18,322
I think Fermat's principle can be used to do it but I am not being successful
Yes. I've found it on Wikipedia, but I do not know what you mean by "without calculus". I even don't know, how to formulate it without calculus.
 
  • #3
weirdoguy
916
822
I think Fermat's principle can be used to do it but I am not being successful

No surprise since Fermat's principle is a type of variational principle, so it is somewhat connected to calculus.
 
  • #4
ZapperZ
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Insights Author
35,994
4,715
Well, I have checked out the ones with calculus but I was just wondering if there was one without calculus
I tried it but could not do it
I think Fermat's principle can be used to do it but I am not being successful
So, anyone please help

This question doesn't make any sense. It is like asking if one can do kinematics with something that has variable velocity and acceleration but without calculus. In many of these cases, not using calculus is NOT an option!

And as stated already, Fermat Principle itself is based on calculus, i.e. finding the path of least time, which is a variational calculus application (see Pg. 8 of this document). So I have no idea why you'd think that using Fermat Principle is not using calculus.

Zz.
 
  • #5
shihab-kol
119
8
This question doesn't make any sense.

Zz.

Oh yes it does.
And as stated already, Fermat Principle itself is based on calculus, i.e. finding the path of least time, which is a variational calculus application (see Pg. 8 of this document). So I have no idea why you'd think that using Fermat Principle is not using calculus.

But it can be done WITHOUT calculus too.

You can prove snell's law too WITHOUT calculus.

I have seen the proof and it is by R.P.Feynman.
So, thanks but no thanks
 
  • #6
Drakkith
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
2022 Award
22,253
6,326
I have seen the proof and it is by R.P.Feynman.

Feynman's "proof" isn't really a proof. At least the example I've seen from his lectures isn't. It explains how you can use geometry to find an answer in a specific case where there's a single boundary and two non-varying refractive indices. A real proof inherently requires calculus because it has to deal with continuously varying variables. Page 8 in Zz's link contains this exact situation and you cannot use geometry by itself to solve it.
 
  • #7
Higgsono
93
4
Can't you use the property of isotropy of space and the time invariance of physical law? But that may only prove that incident angle is equal to the reflected angle for total reflection.
 
  • #8
davenn
Science Advisor
Gold Member
9,651
9,180
Oh yes it does.


But it can be done WITHOUT calculus too.

You can prove snell's law too WITHOUT calculus.

I have seen the proof and it is by R.P.Feynman.
So, thanks but no thanks

since you are going against good advice and say it can be done
then the onus is on you to show us how it is done and we can see if it makes sense
 
  • #9
DrDu
Science Advisor
6,258
906
You only have to match the wavevectors parallel to the surface of the light inside and outside the medium. This doesn't involve calculus, merely vector arithmetics.
 
  • #10
But when fermat devised his principle at that time there was no calculus. As calculus came much after by Newton and leibnitz.Fermat must have done in his own way.Or he just gave us an intuitional principle with no proof or he had find maxima or minima in his own way.

I gues this question/topic needs importance.

http://aapt.scitation.org/doi/10.1119/1.1514235

Moderator's edit: File substituted by link due to potential copyright violation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
shihab-kol
119
8
Thanks.
Being an Indian,perhaps you have gone through H.C.Verma .There also you will find a simple but elegant proof of the above.
I did not post anything since by the time I started the thread the book has been returned and I could not include the proof on the site .
Thanks once again.
 

Suggested for: Simple proof of Snell's law without calculus

  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
479
Replies
1
Views
316
Replies
1
Views
221
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
633
Replies
21
Views
177
Replies
42
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
799
Replies
3
Views
1K
Top