Simple question about writing a log-how does the root go turn to divison?

  • Thread starter Thread starter singleton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Root Writing
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding how to apply logarithmic rules to simplify expressions. The original expression, (31.7^5 x 0.64 / 171.8)^1/3, is transformed using logarithmic properties. The exponent 1/3 is brought in front by applying the power law of logarithms, which states that log(a^c) = c*log(a). Participants clarify that the confusion arose from not recognizing the application of logarithmic laws to the expression inside the brackets. Ultimately, the explanation helps clarify the relationship between the logarithmic transformation and the exponent.
singleton
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
Simple question about writing a log--how does the root go turn to divison?

I understand the product, quotient and power laws of logarithms. But this piece in the book has me stumped. It says how they used logarithms to rewrite calculations and make them easier to figure out. Fair enough. But I'm not sure how part of it happens! (and the book sucks at expanding/explanation!)

(31.7^5 x 0.64 / 171.8)^1/3

becomes

1/3{5log31.7 + log0.64 - log171.8}

I understand what is inside of the braces, but how can the exponent come down in front like that :confused:

I can understand {5log31.7 + log0.64 - log171.8}^1/3 but not what is stated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi

Do you know your log rules?

log (AB) = log A + log B

log (A / B) = log A - log B

log (a^c) = c*loga

Going to your problem we first work inside the brackets.

31.7^5 x 0.64 / 171.8 is what we will work with first.

So take the log of the numerator. It is a product. We have

log (31.7^5 * 0.64) / log (171.8). Use your log rules.

log (31.7^5) = 5*log(31.7)

= 5*log(31.7) + log 0.64 - log 171.8 (By our rules, try to figure it out)

Now we work with the power.

(5*log(31.7) + log 0.64 - log 171.8) ^ 1/3

= 1/3 (5* log(31.7) + log 0.64 - log 171.8)

Hence our problem is solved.
 
Sorry I should have stated how far I understand.

I understand the log laws and I can get to
(5*log(31.7) + log 0.64 - log 171.8) ^ 1/3

but I couldn't get the 1/3 in front

OHHHHH

frig
I wasn't even thinking about the power law :/
I was thinking in terms of solving what is inside the brackets (5.076)^1/3

I wasn't thinking of terms of the brackets having the log laws apply to them

I'm so stupid :cry:

Edit: What I meant to say was that, I wasn't even thinking of what is inside the braces in terms of a log, rather I saw the "final solution" in my head and couldn't understand how it to the exponent 1/3 worked out that way. It makes better sense now.

Thanks ;)
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
2
Replies
74
Views
5K
Replies
24
Views
6K
2
Replies
96
Views
9K
Back
Top