Simple Question probably making it harder than it is

  • Thread starter Thread starter cheechnchong
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To determine the number of atoms in 0.25 g of CO2, the discussion emphasizes converting grams to moles using Avogadro's number. The balanced equation indicates that 1 mole of CO2 contains 1 mole of carbon and 2 moles of oxygen. Participants agree that calculating the moles first simplifies the stoichiometry problem. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between moles and atoms in chemical compounds. Overall, the focus is on applying stoichiometric principles to solve the problem efficiently.
cheechnchong
Messages
132
Reaction score
1
Ok i made this question up, buuuut...

Say you have 0.25 g Carbon and it's from the CO2. How much atoms are in C and O?

haha the way I've been writing it down is C = 1 mol and O = 2 mol
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Write out the balanced equation, then it turns into a simple stoich problem
 
Stevedye56 said:
Write out the balanced equation, then it turns into a simple stoich problem

hahah let me rephrase the question...it's 0.25 g CO2! how much atoms of each element? another oopsers
 
change CO2 to moles and then go from there.
 
Stevedye56 said:
change CO2 to moles and then go from there.

ok so go the avrogado route i see!

yeah makes sense too since writing down atoms from the CO2 is based off of 1 mol of the compound.
 
cheechnchong said:
ok so go the avrogado route i see!

yeah makes sense too since writing down atoms from the CO2 is based off of 1 mol of the compound.


Avagadro FTW!:biggrin:
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top