MHB Simplification of Powers of Five

  • Thread starter Thread starter CSmith1
  • Start date Start date
CSmith1
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
write in the form 5^r, where r is a rational number.

1.)1
2.)1/5
3)(square root 5)^7
4.)3 suare root 25
5.)square root 125
6.)1/ square roor 5



1. r = 0 (anything to the 0th power is 1)

2. y = 5^x
1/5 = 5^x
x = -1

3. sqrt(5)^7 = 5^x
x = 7/2
4. cube root (25) = 5^x --->
25 ^1/3 = 5^x
25= 5^2
x = 2/3

5. sqrt(125) = 5^x
125 = 5^3
125^1/2 = 5^x
5^3/2 = 5^x
x = 3/2

6. 1/sqrt(5) = 5^x
5^-1/2 = 5^x
x = -1/2
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
CSmith said:
write in the form 5^r, where r is a rational number.

1.)1
2.)1/5
3)(square root 5)^7
4.)3 suare root 25
5.)square root 125
6.)1/ square roor 5



1. r = 0 (anything to the 0th power is 1)

2. y = 5^x
1/5 = 5^x
x = -1

3. sqrt(5)^7 = 5^x
x = 7/2
4. cube root (25) = 5^x --->
25 ^1/3 = 5^x
25= 5^2
x = 2/3

5. sqrt(125) = 5^x
125 = 5^3
125^1/2 = 5^x
5^3/2 = 5^x
x = 3/2

6. 1/sqrt(5) = 5^x
5^-1/2 = 5^x
x = -1/2

Mostly correct (you have the value of all your exponents correct). What you need to watch out for is that the question states write in the form 5^r... meaning your answers should be written as $5^r$ instead of working out r and leaving it there.
If I take your first one as an example you correctly figured out that r=0 so you'd put $5^0$ as your answer instead of 0.

I know it seems trivial (and it probably is) but that's the sort of thing examiners love taking away an answer mark for (Devil)
 
CSmith said:
1. r = 0 (anything to the 0th power is 1)

Except $ \displaystyle 0^0 $ which is undefined...
 
CSmith said:
1. r = 0 (anything to the 0th power is 1)

What CSmith has written is correct even if some care has to be used in order to avoid confusion. As explained in... http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f15/difference-equation-tutorial-draft-part-i-426/

... the exponential sequence on base $\displaystyle\alpha$ the general term of which is usually written as $\displaystyle\alpha^{n}$ is defined by the recursive relation…

$\displaystyle a_{n+1}= \alpha\ a_{n}\ ,\ a_{0}=1\ ,\ \alpha \in \mathbb{R}$ (1)

... so that the sequence $\displaystyle \alpha^{n}$ is $1\ ,\ \alpha\ ,\ \alpha^{2}\ ,\ ...$. That is true of course also for $\displaystyle \alpha=0$ so that the sequence $\displaystyle 0^{n}$ is $1\ ,\ 0\ ,\ 0\ ,\ ...$.

In a fully different situation we are when if we have to valuate the limit...

$\displaystyle \lim_{x \rightarrow 0} \alpha(x)^ {\gamma(x)}$ (2)

... where $\alpha(0)=\gamma(0)=0$. Here the term indeterminate form is correctly used because the limit (2) is not 'automatically' equal to 1 in any case...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
41
Views
5K
Replies
59
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top