MHB Simplify Multiplication of Fractions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on simplifying the sum of a series involving fractions with factorials in the denominator. The series is expressed as a telescoping sum, which allows for significant simplification. By rewriting the original series, it is shown that the sum can be reduced to a difference of factorial terms. The final result is calculated as 2 multiplied by the difference between the reciprocal of 3! and 100!. This approach effectively simplifies the multiplication of fractions in the given series.
Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0
$\dfrac{3}{3\times 4}+\dfrac{4}{3\times 4\times 5}+\dfrac{5}{3\times 4\times 5\times 6}+\cdots+\dfrac {99}{3\times 4\times 5\times 6\times \cdots\times 99\times 100}$
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: count value

Albert said:
$\dfrac{3}{3\times 4}+\dfrac{4}{3\times 4\times 5}+\dfrac{5}{3\times 4\times 5\times 6}+ \cdots +\dfrac {99}{3\times 4\times 5\times 6\times \cdots \times 99\times 100}$

$=2 \left( \dfrac{3}{2 \times 3\times 4}+\dfrac{4}{2\times 3\times 4\times 5}+\dfrac{5}{2\times 3\times 4\times 5\times 6}+ \cdots +\dfrac {99}{2 \times 3\times 4\times 5\times 6\times \cdots \times 99\times 100} \right)$

$$=2 \sum^{100}_ {n=4} \frac{n-1}{n!}=2 \sum^{100}_ {n=4} \frac{1}{(n-1)!}-\frac{1}{n!} $$

The sum is telescoping

$$2\left( \dfrac{1}{3!} -\dfrac{1}{4!} + \dfrac{1}{4!} - \dfrac{1}{5!} + \frac{1}{5!}-\frac{1}{6!}+ \cdots +\dfrac {1}{99!} - \dfrac {1}{100!} \right)= 2 \left(\dfrac{1}{3!}-\dfrac{1}{100!} \right) $$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
907
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top