Simplifying an Expression with x>>a: Step-by-Step Guide

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around simplifying an expression under the assumption that x is much greater than a (x >> a). Participants are trying to understand how to apply this approximation to reach a simplified form of an equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the assumption that terms involving a can be neglected when x is significantly larger. There are attempts to simplify specific expressions, but some express confusion about how to correctly apply the approximation. Questions arise regarding the steps taken and the reasoning behind them.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the approximation method, while others are seeking clarification on their own attempts to simplify the expression. There is an ongoing exploration of different approaches, with no clear consensus yet on the correct method or outcome.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need to show their work to facilitate feedback and highlight the importance of considering higher-order terms in approximations. There is a suggestion to work with common denominators and numerators to aid in simplification.

MathewsMD
Messages
430
Reaction score
7
Hi,

I've attached a screenshot in which a solution simplifies an expression given x>>a. I have been trying to simplify and express the equation as shown, but keep failing to recognize how they reached their solution. If anyone could provide a step-by-step breakdown that would be greatly appreciated!
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-01-20 at 11.32.45 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-01-20 at 11.32.45 PM.png
    10.1 KB · Views: 506
Physics news on Phys.org
When x>>a then you can assume that x\pm a\to x In other words, you just cancel the a when it's in a similar form to the above.

3x^2-a^2\approx 3x^2 for example.
 
Mentallic said:
When x>>a then you can assume that x\pm a\to x In other words, you just cancel the a when it's in a similar form to the above.

3x^2-a^2\approx 3x^2 for example.

Okay. That is what I did...I may just be simplifying incorrectly but the expression never seems to simplify to the answer stated...I've tried expanding the given equation multiple times now but to no avail and anyone's steps to simplify this would be greatly appreciated!
 
MathewsMD said:
Okay. That is what I did...I may just be simplifying incorrectly but the expression never seems to simplify to the answer stated...I've tried expanding the given equation multiple times now but to no avail and anyone's steps to simplify this would be greatly appreciated!

I think you need to show what you tried before anyone can make a comment on where you are going wrong. Put the terms over a common denominator first and then work with the numerator.
 
Last edited:
Mentallic said:
When x>>a then you can assume that x\pm a\to x In other words, you just cancel the a when it's in a similar form to the above.

3x^2-a^2\approx 3x^2 for example.
You need to be a little more careful. For example, suppose you have something like ##\frac{1}{x-a}##. You can factor the denominator and expand as a series to get
$$\frac{1}{x(1-a/x)} = \frac{1}{x}\left[1+\frac{a}{x}+\left(\frac{a}{x}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{a}{x}\right)^3 + \cdots \right].$$ If you say
$$\frac{1}{x-a} \rightarrow \frac{1}{x},$$ you're only taking the zeroth-order approximation. The first-order approximation would be
$$\frac{1}{x-a} \rightarrow \frac{1}{x}+\frac{a}{x^2}.$$ You generally want to keep enough terms to find the first non-vanishing order in some calculation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K