No, because ln1 = 0. The fraction would simplify to 0/(0 + 1 - 1), so you're at the indeterminate form [0/0].MathewsMD said:
Why can't the equation be simplified in the third step where it specifies that the equation is indeterminate? You could essentially have ln1/(ln1+1-1) if you substitute values in here. This then simplifies to just ln1/ln1 and then they would cancel to equal 1.
MathewsMD said:
Mark44 said:
Simplifying earlier in the scientific process can save time and resources by reducing the complexity of the problem. It also allows for a clearer understanding of the variables involved and can lead to more accurate and efficient results.
Yes, simplifying too early in the process can potentially lead to biased or inaccurate results. It is important to carefully consider which variables can be simplified without significantly impacting the overall outcome.
Scientists determine when to simplify in their research by carefully analyzing the problem and identifying which variables are essential to the experiment. They also take into account the potential impact of simplifying certain variables on the overall results.
One potential drawback to simplifying earlier in the scientific process is that it may limit the scope and applicability of the results. Additionally, simplifying too much can oversimplify the problem and lead to less meaningful or applicable findings.
Simplifying earlier in the process can benefit the scientific community by improving the efficiency and accuracy of research. It can also make findings more accessible and applicable to a wider audience, leading to potential advancements in various fields.