Finding Percent Error in S.R. Problem: Simplifying Expression with 6.7x10^(-16)

AI Thread Summary
To find the percent error in the specified S.R. problem, the expression 6.7x10^(-16) / (1 + 6.7x10^(-16)) can be simplified by recognizing that the denominator approaches 1 when approximating for small values. For exact calculations, dividing 6.7 by 10000000000000006.7 is necessary to maintain precision. This problem arises in Griffith's EM chapter 12, comparing Galilean and Einstein velocity addition at low speeds. The need for high precision is questioned, as calculators may struggle with such small values. The discussion concludes with the problem being resolved.
Legion81
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
I'm finding the percent error in a S.R. problem and getting a really small number. How can I find the exact percentage? This is the result that needs to be simplified:

6.7x10^(-16) / (1 + 6.7x10^(-16))

If I do an order of magnitude approximation, then the bottom becomes 1, but that will make the top zero since we are assuming 6.7x10^(-16) to be zero.

Any ideas on simplifying this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The result is very close to 6.7 X 10-16.

\frac{6.7 x 10^{-16}}{1 + 6.7 x 10^{-16}} = \frac{6.7}{10^{16} + 6.7}

by multiplying the numerator and denominator by 1016.

If you want the exact value, divide 6.7 by 10000000000000006.7, either by long division or a calculator that can handle this many significant digits.

Why do you need this much precision, though?
 
Ah! I should have thought of that. It's a problem in Griffith's EM chapter 12. They want the percent error using Galilean vs Einstein velocity addition for two things moving 5mph and 60mph. I guess it's to show this is a non-relativistic speed? Kind of ridiculous if you ask me.

Thank you for the reply. My calculator and Mathematica didn't want to spit out that many digits.

Consider this thread solved.
 
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks
Back
Top