MHB Simplifying radicals - Help with basic number manipulation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on simplifying the expression (sqrt6/sqrt7) * sqrt21. The correct method involves moving sqrt7 to the denominator of sqrt21, simplifying it to sqrt6 * sqrt3, which equals 3sqrt2. A participant initially made an error by incorrectly multiplying by sqrt7/sqrt7, leading to confusion in their calculations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of simplicity in mathematical operations and encourages using straightforward methods for clarity.
Comscistudent
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hi I'm trying to give myself a refresher in Leaving Cert maths and I'm running through some problems. Here's one which has me stumped (sorry I can't figure out how to show the actual symbols on the post, it's just showing as raw LaTEX when I try )

Combine terms and simplify the expression of -

(sqrt6/sqrt7) * sqrt21

The actual answer is that you move the /sqrt7 to the sqrt21 to end up with sqrt6 * sqrt3 = 2sqrt3

I missed this and instead multiplied the right hand term by sqrt7/sqrt7 but my answer is different. Can someone explain why my logic is incorrect?

(sqrt6/sqrt7) * ( (sqrt21*sqrt7)/sqrt7 )
sqrt6/sqrt7 * sqrt147/sqrt7
sqrt882/sqrt7
3sqrt14
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi TubeAlloy and welcome to MHB! :D

$$\dfrac{\sqrt6}{\sqrt7}\cdot\sqrt{21}=\sqrt{18}=3\sqrt2$$

TubeAlloy said:
(sqrt6/sqrt7) * ( (sqrt21*sqrt7)/sqrt7 )
sqrt6/sqrt7 * sqrt147/sqrt7
sqrt882/sqrt7
3sqrt14

Your logic is fine but you've made an error in your calculation. Can you spot it?

Quote this post to see how I coded the $\LaTeX$.
 
Oh wow I feel so silly, thanks a million for the help once I knew I wasn't doing something wrong I was able to spot the error.

$$\dfrac{\sqrt6}{\sqrt7}\cdot\dfrac{\sqrt147}{\sqrt7}$$

This is $$\dfrac{\sqrt882}{\sqrt49}$$ not $$\dfrac{\sqrt882}{\sqrt7}$$ as I had thought

So then it's $$\sqrt18$$ == $$3\sqrt2$$
 
Good work!

To get all of the numbers in a radical under the square root sign use \sqrt{123}. Note the curly braces. :)
 
TubeAlloy said:
Combine terms and simplify the expression: \frac{\sqrt{6}}{\sqrt{7}}\cdot\sqrt{21}

The actual answer is that you move the /sqrt7 to the sqrt21 to end up with sqrt6 * sqrt3 = 2sqrt3

I missed this and instead multiplied the right hand term by sqrt7/sqrt7 . Why?
but my answer is different. Can someone explain why my logic is incorrect?

(sqrt6/sqrt7) * ( (sqrt21*sqrt7)/sqrt7 )
sqrt6/sqrt7 * sqrt147/sqrt7
sqrt882/sqrt7
3sqrt14
Did some teacher tell you, "To simplify radicals,
introduce more radicals into the expression" ?

Here is the recommended way to simplify it:

. . \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> \dfrac{\sqrt{6}}{\sqrt{7}}\cdot\sqrt{21} &amp;=&amp; \sqrt{6}\cdot\dfrac{\sqrt{21}}{\sqrt{7}} \\ <br /> &amp;= &amp; \sqrt{6}\cdot\sqrt{\dfrac{21}{7}} \\ <br /> &amp; = &amp; \sqrt6\cdot\sqrt{3} \\<br /> &amp; = &amp; \sqrt{18} \\<br /> &amp;=&amp; \sqrt{9\cdot2} \\<br /> &amp;=&amp; \sqrt{9}\cdot\sqrt{2} \\<br /> &amp;=&amp; 3\sqrt{2} \end{array}


 
soroban has made an excellent point: the simpler the better! It's good to see experimentation with other methods though, and I think it's good that the error was spotted. Sometimes the simpler approach is not always realized so it's a good thing to be able to adapt one's skill set to the problem at hand. But at the end of the day, I think striving for simplicity is the best approach.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top