Simplyfying (Indentitied related)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ASMATHSHELPME
  • Start date Start date
ASMATHSHELPME
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Simple for you guys i guess, But tough for me - Guess I am just thick!

x^4 +Ax^3 + 5x^2 + x + 3 = (x^2 +4)(X^2 -x +B) +Cx +D

I get:

x^4 +Ax^3 + 5x^2 + x + 3 = X^4 -x^3 - 4x^2 + Bx^2 - 4x + 4B + Cx + D

Now, I think i need to simplify this more because i can't compare co-efficients can i?

Can someone run me through the further simplifications?

Maybe Bx^2 + 4x^2 into (4+B)X^2 ? Is this wise and possible? What else?

Need to learn simplification better, Finding my basic maths is poor so Alevel is tough!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The law of distribution of multiplication over addition: a*(b + c) = a*b + a*c. The equality sign means that any expression of the form of the right hand side may be replaced by the expression on the left hand side (and vice versa) and still maintain the truth of the original expression. As long as X=x in your expression, what you're doing is fine. :smile:
 
You're on the right path, my friend!

x^4 +Ax^3 + 5x^2 + x + 3 = (x^2 +4)(x^2 -x +B) +Cx +D
<=>
x^4 +Ax^3 + 5x^2 + x + 3 = x^4 - x^3 + Bx^2 + 4x^2 - 4x + 4B +Cx +D
<=(cancellation & simplification)=>
Ax^3 + 5x^2 + x + 3 = - x^3 + (B+4)x^2 + (C-4)x + 4B + D
 
Now recall that if that is true for all x, then the corresponding coefficients must be equal. You can just look at that and see what A must be!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top