Simulated gravity-satellites in orbit

  • Thread starter Thread starter kiro484
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of the inner surface of a rotating artificial ringworld, designed to simulate gravity at 9.73 m/s². The challenge arises from the need to determine the mass of the central star and the orbital period, with assumptions made that the star has a mass similar to the sun. Participants note that the ring's own gravitational pull is negligible compared to the simulated gravity generated by its rotation. The acceleration attributed to the sun is minimal, reinforcing that the primary source of the simulated gravity is the ring's rotational motion. Overall, the calculations hinge on understanding centripetal acceleration rather than traditional gravitational forces.
kiro484
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Ringworld is an artificial world constructed in the shape of a giant ring that rotates around a star similar to our sun. The radius of the ring is 1.53x10^11m (from the sun to the ring). The mass of ringworld is 2.1x10^27kg and its simulated gravitational acceleration is 9.73m/s^2. Determine how fast the inner surface of the ringworld is moving to experience a "gravitational" (no idea why this is put in quotations in the question) acceleration of 9.73 m/s^2.
Gravitational constant=6.67x10^-11


Homework Equations


Vcentripetal=2πr/T
Acentripetal=v^2/r or =4π^2(r)/T^2
F=Gm1m2/r^2
g=Gm/r^2
T1^2/R1^3=T2^2/R2^3
Any combination of the above also work.

The Attempt at a Solution


How do you find the mass of the central body and the orbital period? It seems impossible to do anything without knowing one or the another. I don't know where to start.

Any help is appreciated. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It says similar to the sun, so assume it has that same mass. The speed with which the ring is 'orbiting' its sun is what you are trying to calculate. But it isn't really orbiting it all, since its mass centre is at the sun. It is merely rotating around its sun.
I am a bit worried that it quotes the mass of the ring. Seems like they expect you to take into account its gravitational pull. Not sure how to get that when the point of interest is not on the axis of the ring. As I recall, you can't do that by taking the ring to be a line of zero width - the integral does not converge.
 
The acceleration due to gravity from the sun is less than 0.01 m/s^2, so it's not significant. The ring is a thousand times lighter, so its gravity isn't significant either. All the simulated "gravitiational" acceleration has to come from the acceleration due to the rotation of the ring. (the quotes are there because the acceleration isn't due to gravity). The computation would be the same if the ring was rotating on its own without a nearby sun.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top