Simulating Core Drops: Cement Cubes at Gulf of Mexico Oil Conduits

  • Thread starter Thread starter cph
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Core Drop
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the feasibility of dropping a 10x10x10 ft cement cube into the Gulf of Mexico to seal an oil/gas conduit extending 1000 ft below the sediment surface. The proposed method involves the cube penetrating 2000 ft of water and potentially collapsing the conduit by displacing sediment. The velocity of the drop is estimated to be around 700+ mph for approximately 2 seconds at this depth. The conversation also explores whether this scenario could serve as a simulation for various core drops, including those related to planetesimals and black holes. The concept emphasizes the differences between non-compressible and compressible fluids in the context of the drop's impact.
cph
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
As previously described,* might one drop a 10x10x10 ft cement cube at 15-20 ft from Gulf of Mexico oil/gas conduit. The intent is to seal up such conduit extending down ~1000 ft below sediment surface. The non-compressible fluid collapsing and sealing soft metal casing and compressible gaseous fluid interior. What might be the velocity of such core drop; and might it extend even through the formation? Might this constitute a simulation for ANY core drop, such as for iron inner core of planetesimal hitting proto-earth? Likewise for final core drop of coalescing black holes? Scaling up of mass would not seem relevant for such core drops. Thus might the velocity of core drop be ~700+ mph for say 2 seconds for at 2000 ft water depth?

* CUBIC BLOCK

Make 10 ft sided cubic block (1000 cu ft) of concrete on platform. Then drop such block 2000 ft (10 secs?), which might penetrate 1000 ft(?) into water soaked sediments. Drop it slightly off target, so that sub-mud surface conduit collapses shut. Water is non-compressible fluid, whereas gas in conduit is a compressible fluid. So the cubic block would push muck over into conduit, collapsing it.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
cph said:
As previously described,* might one drop a 10x10x10 ft cement cube at 15-20 ft from Gulf of Mexico oil/gas conduit. The intent is to seal up such conduit extending down ~1000 ft below sediment surface. The non-compressible fluid collapsing and sealing soft metal casing and compressible gaseous fluid interior. What might be the velocity of such core drop; and might it extend even through the formation? Might this constitute a simulation for ANY core drop, such as for iron inner core of planetesimal hitting proto-earth? Likewise for final core drop of coalescing black holes? Scaling up of mass would not seem relevant for such core drops. Thus might the velocity of core drop be ~700+ mph for say 2 seconds for at 2000 ft water depth?

* CUBIC BLOCK

Make 10 ft sided cubic block (1000 cu ft) of concrete on platform. Then drop such block 2000 ft (10 secs?), which might penetrate 1000 ft(?) into water soaked sediments. Drop it slightly off target, so that sub-mud surface conduit collapses shut. Water is non-compressible fluid, whereas gas in conduit is a compressible fluid. So the cubic block would push muck over into conduit, collapsing it.

What exactly is your question?

CS
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top