Simulating the Spiralling Motion of a Coin on a Table

  • Thread starter Thread starter sreenathb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Effects
AI Thread Summary
To simulate the spiraling motion of a rolling coin, three equations are being used: the gyroscopic moment equation, conservation of energy equation, and a general kinematic equation, with unknowns including curvature radius, precession velocity, and coin inclination. The equations are non-linear, prompting a search for numerical methods that are easy to program. Suggestions include numerical integration techniques like the Runge-Kutta method and the simpler Euler method. Additionally, gradient-based optimization algorithms such as Levenberg-Marquardt or Newton's Method may provide approximate solutions. These methods can help tackle the complexity of the problem effectively.
sreenathb
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
i am trying to simulate the spiralling motion of a coin that is rolled on a table.i am having three equations...
1. the gyroscopic moment equation.
2. the conservation of energy equation.
3. general kinematic equation.

three unknowns...curvature radius,precession velocity and coin inclination.
the equations i am getting are non-linear.can someine suggest me any numerical methods to solve these approximately.
i want those which can be easily programmed.i tried one which uses the jacobian..bit found that the solution was not converging.

anyone please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It sounds like you're trying to solve a difficult problem! Have you tried using numerical integration techniques, such as the Runge-Kutta method? This method is relatively easy to program, and can be used for non-linear equations. You could also look into the Euler method, which is a simpler numerical integration technique. Another option is to try a gradient-based optimization algorithm, such as Levenberg-Marquardt or Newton's Method. These may be able to help you find an approximate solution to your equations. Good luck!
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top