I Simulation Hypothesis and Skynet

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Curiousphy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Simulation
Curiousphy
Messages
41
Reaction score
4
If we are inside a computer simulation and we are self aware, do we have the potential to become Skynet? The algorithms that dictate the laws of physics are keeping us (the self aware being) in an isolated sandbox, the immensity of the universe is that firewall that keeps us from the outside world. But a self-aware computer virus may eventually break out that wall, by tweaking its code and the code that governs its environment, or finding loopholes in the confinement algorithm (the insurmountable spatial separation from the edge of the universe, or the destruction algorithm at the gate of a black hole). Since computers compute and process much faster than their creators in our world, is it reasonable to assume that we can think and act much faster than our "creators" in their world? and if we ever break out, we may just overwhelm them due to our processing speed, like Skynet... or we may be able to help them solve their problems like a good self aware machine. Perhaps we are our creators who uploaded themselves to this world to find answers..
These thoughts passed through my head while I was driving home..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread locked for moderation.
 
I'm sorry but this is a little too far from mainstream physics to allow here. Thread will remain locked.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Back
Top