Single Trapped Atom Wins UK Science Photography Prize?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DennisN
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photos Science
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a remarkable achievement in scientific photography, where a university student in the UK captured an image of a single atom using a standard camera and a specialized lens. Participants express their astonishment at the feat, noting that the image resembles a distant star, appearing as a mere point of light due to the atom's minuscule size. The conversation delves into the technical aspects of the photography, with some suggesting that long-exposure techniques were used to capture the faint emissions from the atom. There is debate about the specifics of the lens used, with clarifications that it was a focal extender rather than a high-focus lens. The thread also touches on the implications of such technology, humorously speculating on the potential for monitoring atoms in everyday life. Additionally, users share links to other impressive scientific images and discuss the beauty of visualizing objects that are typically invisible to the naked eye. Overall, the thread highlights the intersection of art and science in capturing the unseen world at the atomic level.
DennisN
Gold Member
Messages
2,159
Reaction score
9,634
Some very nice photos here:
Picture of Single Trapped Atom Wins UK Science Photography Prize (Gizmodo)

e.g.
A Strontium atom
hyejinr2kjmfu74vfqrz.png


Polymers.
cyetc7varairziiykdxs.jpg
 

Attachments

  • hyejinr2kjmfu74vfqrz.png
    hyejinr2kjmfu74vfqrz.png
    148.2 KB · Views: 1,093
  • cyetc7varairziiykdxs.jpg
    cyetc7varairziiykdxs.jpg
    33.6 KB · Views: 1,214
  • Like
Likes Oldman too, nuuskur, Psinter and 4 others
Physics news on Phys.org
Those 2 "pencil lead" looking probes appear to only be maybe 10 atoms diameter (for the probe portion).
 
I was going to say: "Whoa, that is one big atom", but then I checked the periodic table to confirm it is actually a big atom and that my eyes were not fooling me.
 
I don't think the "atom" is anywhere near that big; traps of that type are quite big (look at the first photo in the link) and what you are really seeing is a diffuse "blob" which is the result of the ion scattering light; the apparent size will depend on the optics (I believe they typically use high NA microscope objectives) and the resolution of the detector. It has -as far as I am aware- nothing to do with the real size of the ion.
 
I'm not sure if many have heard of this, but a university student in the UK managed to take a picture of a single atom, using only a regular camera and a special high focus lens that would be able to capture the light to see the atom.

I think this a truly remarkable feat, as well as some of the other contestants' photos. Found out about it from this link: https://www.sciencealert.com/photo-of-a-single-trapped-atom-wins-uk-science-photo-prize

I find it more interesting that he has only used a regular camera to capture something as small as an atom. What are everybody's thoughts? What else do you think we might be able to see with "the naked camera"?
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
lekh2003 said:
using only a regular camera and a special high focus lens

I didn't see anything about a high-focus lens (not even sure what that is) in the article. Looks to me like it was taken using long-exposure photography to capture the faint emissions of the atom.

lekh2003 said:
I find it more interesting that he has only used a regular camera to capture something as small as an atom. What are everybody's thoughts? What else do you think we might be able to see with "the naked camera"?

To be fair, the image isn't quite as impressive as I thought it was going to be. The image of the atom is about like the image of a distant star. All you see is a point of light, as the angular diameter of the emitting object is far too small to see any details. Still, an impressive feat nonetheless.
 
Drakkith said:
I didn't see anything about a high-focus lens (not even sure what that is) in the article
He used a camera lens with a very large focal length, it was specialized, but the actual camera was regular.
Drakkith said:
Looks to me like it was taken using long-exposure photography to capture the faint emissions of the atom.
This combined with the special lens.
Drakkith said:
To be fair, the image isn't quite as impressive as I thought it was going to be. The image of the atom is about like the image of a distant star. All you see is a point of light, as the angular diameter of the emitting object is far too small to see any details. Still, an impressive feat nonetheless.
Same here. I thought it might be a little larger and clear. But using regular cameras and high-exposure settings, this is amazing.
 
lekh2003 said:
He used a camera lens with a very large focal length, it was specialized, but the actual camera was regular.

I don't see any information on the lens used. Was it in the article, or somewhere else?
 
  • #10
Oh there's nothing special about the lens accessory he used, it's just a focal extender.
 
  • #11
Drakkith said:
Oh there's nothing special about the lens accessory he used, it's just a focal extender.
Oh ok. Thanks for telling me that.
 
  • #12
Wow, this is like a whole new level of micro-management. Your boss will be able to observe and marshall every atom of your body using this relatively cheap camera setup.
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN, phinds and sophiecentaur
  • #13
jedishrfu said:
Wow, this is like a whole new level of micro-management. Your boss will be able to observe and marshall every atom of your body using this relatively cheap camera setup.
Haha - if he has a long while to do it in.
 
  • #14
lekh2003 said:
I'm not sure if many have heard of this, but a university student in the UK managed to take a picture of a single atom, using only a regular camera and a special high focus lens that would be able to capture the light to see the atom.

[..]

I find it more interesting that he has only used a regular camera to capture something as small as an atom. What are everybody's thoughts? What else do you think we might be able to see with "the naked camera"?
Hi, @lekh2003, I think you will also find these posts interesting:
from the thread What is the smallest particle which can be visually observed?
 
  • #15
jedishrfu said:
Wow, this is like a whole new level of micro-management. Your boss will be able to observe and marshall every atom of your body using this relatively cheap camera setup.
Soon in an app for our smart phones: "Turn on/off notifications for when this atom changes state."
 
  • Like
Likes Drakkith and jedishrfu
  • #16
DennisN said:
Some very nice photos here:

The second photo is an image of fluorescently counterstained cells- the nuclei are blue and microtubules (I guess they are polymers) are green. Not sure why the caption (on the website) says "Screening the different shapes of certain polymers", that's misleading.
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN and BillTre
  • #17
lekh2003 said:
I find it more interesting that he has only used a regular camera to capture something as small as an atom. What are everybody's thoughts? What else do you think we might be able to see with "the naked camera"?

Keep in mind that the image is not resolving the atom, what has been imaged is just the point-spread function. Just an Airy disc, same as imaging stars.

If you want to see truly impressive images, Nikon's "Small World" competition sets the bar:

https://www.nikonsmallworld.com/galleries/photo
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark, berkeman, lekh2003 and 2 others
  • #18
  • Like
Likes BillTre
  • #19
lekh2003 said:
These photos are absolutely beautiful. It's amazing how we can look at these objects which are always hidden from eyesight. It feels awesome.
One of the benefits of being science aware!
 
  • #21
I was cleaning up my external storage drive when I came across several SEM images that I took several years back. I decided to post this one here because it is rather self-explanatory, for most part.

This is an SEM image of a copper iris that was inside an RF cavity under very high RF field (I believe, up to 80 MV/m, if I remember it correctly). It didn't function properly, and when it was taken out, we saw pitted regions where we suspected arcing at occurred (RF vacuum breakdown). So I look at it closer under an SEM and noticed something quite fascinating that added to our body of knowledge of what went on during this breakdown event.

The picture show the region where I was focusing on, and if you look at the images, it look like water ripples coming out of a center. I saw this repeatedly at all the regions that I examined.

What we believed happened was that the bombardment of ionized gasses due to the arc had such a high energy that they melted the surface of the Cu, causing these "splash" patterns. These happened very quickly and over such a short time (at most, within half of the RF cycle, 100 picosecond time scale) that as soon as it was over, the melting stops and so the splash patterns are frozen.

cu.jpg

It was fascinating to see many of these patterns in the pitted region of the iris.

This, BTW, is where my current avatar came from. :)

Zz.
 

Attachments

  • cu.jpg
    cu.jpg
    98.7 KB · Views: 524
  • Like
Likes Ibix, collinsmark, Drakkith and 4 others
  • #22
ZapperZ said:
This is an SEM image of a copper iris that was inside an RF cavity under very high RF field
Fascinating image!
 
  • #23
Magnetic resonance imaging of single atoms on a surface:
(photo from the article World's smallest MRI performed on single atoms (nanowerk))

id53087_2.jpg

Article said:
The bright areas mark positions where the atom's magnetic field is the same.
(Image: Philip Willke et al)

I posted about the new paper here in this thread, including an open access arxiv link.
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt and Drakkith
Back
Top