Sinking a cylinder with varying hole sizes

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an experiment involving a cylinder with a varying hole size at its base, placed in water to measure the time taken for it to completely submerge. The original poster attempts to derive the relationship between the hole size and the submersion time, proposing that the time is inversely proportional to the hole size. They express difficulty in progressing from their initial force equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the forces acting on the cylinder, including gravity, buoyancy, and drag. There are attempts to clarify the definitions of variables and the relevance of various equations, such as Bernoulli's equation and the continuity equation. Questions arise regarding the relationship between the submerged volume of the cylinder and the inflow of water through the hole.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and suggestions for approaching the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the importance of considering steady state conditions and the dynamics of water levels inside and outside the cylinder. There is no explicit consensus yet, as various interpretations and methods are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity introduced by the changing mass of water and the varying velocity of the cylinder, which complicates the analysis. There is also mention of the need for diagrams to better visualize the situation, particularly regarding the water levels inside and outside the cylinder.

  • #31
lloydthebartender said:
##d(A(y-h))=vadt##
##dt=\frac{d(A(y-h))}{va}##?
Right.
But A and h are constants, so can you rewrite that in the form dy/dt=...?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
The next step is the Bernoulli equation. Need to be careful, though. The v I defined is relative to the cylinder, and the cylinder is moving. Bernoulli will tell you the gained velocity in the lab frame.
 
  • #33
haruspex said:
Right.
But A and h are constants, so can you rewrite that in the form dy/dt=...?
##\frac{dy}{dt}=\frac{va}{A-h}##?
haruspex said:
The next step is the Bernoulli equation. Need to be careful, though. The v I defined is relative to the cylinder, and the cylinder is moving. Bernoulli will tell you the gained velocity in the lab frame.
So if ##u## is the negative, downwards velocity of the cylinder [at the hole = above the hole]
##\frac{1}{2}\rho (v+u)^2+\rho gz_{1}+P_{1}=\frac{1}{2}\rho (\frac{a(v+u)}{A})^2+\rho gz_{2}+P_{2}##?
 
  • #34
lloydthebartender said:
##\frac{dy}{dt}=\frac{va}{A-h}##?
No, you've made some mistake in the algebra. Try again. A-h makes no sense, you cannot subtract a distance from an area.
lloydthebartender said:
So if ##u## is the negative, downwards velocity of the cylinder [at the hole = above the hole]
##\frac{1}{2}\rho (v+u)^2+\rho gz_{1}+P_{1}=\frac{1}{2}\rho (\frac{a(v+u)}{A})^2+\rho gz_{2}+P_{2}##?
Not sure which is 1 and which is 2, but the water is stationary below the hole.
As already noted, z1=z2, so you can cancel those.
What expressions do you have for P1 and P2?
 
  • #35
haruspex said:
No, you've made some mistake in the algebra. Try again. A-h makes no sense, you cannot subtract a distance from an area.
##\frac{d(Ay)−d(Ah)}{dt}=va ##
##\frac{Ad(y)−Ah}{dt}=va ##
##\frac{d(y)−h}{dt}=\frac{va}{A} ##
##\frac{d(y)}{dt}=\frac{va}{A}+h##
Is this correct?

haruspex said:
No, you've made some mistake in the algebra. Try again. A-h makes no sense, you cannot subtract a distance from an area.

Not sure which is 1 and which is 2, but the water is stationary below the hole.
As already noted, z1=z2, so you can cancel those.
What expressions do you have for P1 and P2?
I see.
Below the hole = Above the hole
##\frac{1}{2}\rho (0) + \rho gz_{1}+P_{1}=\frac{1}{2}\rho (v+u) + \rho gz_{2}+P_{2}##
Since ##z_{1}=z_{2}##
##P_{1}=\frac{1}{2}\rho (v+u) +P_{2}##
I rewrite pressure in terms of the depth from the surface of water?
##P_{1} = \rho gy## and ##P_{2} = \rho gh## so
##\rho gy=\frac{1}{2}\rho (v+u)+\rho gh##
##gy=\frac{1}{2} (v+u)+ gh##
 
  • #36
lloydthebartender said:
Is this correct?
No. A and h are constants, so what is the change in Ah, d(Ah), in time dt?
You would have seen something is wrong if you had checked dimensional consistency.
lloydthebartender said:
##\frac{1}{2}\rho (0) + \rho gz_{1}+P_{1}=\frac{1}{2}\rho (v+u) + \rho gz_{2}+P_{2}##
Since ##z_{1}=z_{2}##
##P_{1}=\frac{1}{2}\rho (v+u) +P_{2}##
I rewrite pressure in terms of the depth from the surface of water?
##P_{1} = \rho gy## and ##P_{2} = \rho gh## so
##\rho gy=\frac{1}{2}\rho (v+u)+\rho gh##
##gy=\frac{1}{2} (v+u)+ gh##
Yes, except that you have omitted the power of 2 on the velocity term. Again, dimensionally inconsistent.
 
  • #37
haruspex said:
No. A and h are constants, so what is the change in Ah, d(Ah), in time dt?
You would have seen something is wrong if you had checked dimensional consistency.

Yes, except that you have omitted the power of 2 on the velocity term. Again, dimensionally inconsistent.
Oh...
##\frac{d(Ay)-d(Ah)}{dt}=va##
##\frac{d(Ay)}{dt}-\frac{d(Ah)}{dt}=va##
##\frac{dy}{dt}=\frac{va}{A}##
haruspex said:
Yes, except that you have omitted the power of 2 on the velocity term. Again, dimensionally inconsistent.
##gy=\frac{1}{2}(v+u)^2+gh##
##2g(y-h)=(v+u)^2##
##\sqrt{2g(y-h)}=v+u##
So the downwards velocity of the cylinder is
##u=\sqrt{2g(y-h)}-v##?
 
  • #38
haruspex said:
No. A and h are constants, so what is the change in Ah, d(Ah), in time dt?
You would have seen something is wrong if you had checked dimensional consistency.

Yes, except that you have omitted the power of 2 on the velocity term. Again, dimensionally inconsistent.
At this point do I return to the force equations? I'm still not sure how this all connects back to it.
 
  • #39
lloydthebartender said:
At this point do I return to the force equations? I'm still not sure how this all connects back to it.
Sorry, I forgot to reply...
Your post #37 is correct, but note the dy/dt and u are the same thing, so you can combine those equations to eliminate u.
 
  • #40
haruspex said:
Sorry, I forgot to reply...
Your post #37 is correct, but note the dy/dt and u are the same thing, so you can combine those equations to eliminate u.
##\frac{va}{A}=\sqrt{2g(y-h)}-v##
##a=\frac{A(\sqrt{2g(y-h)}-v)}{v}##

So now I need to make this equation in terms of ##t## and ##a##, right?
 
  • #41
haruspex said:
Sorry, I forgot to reply...
Your post #37 is correct, but note the dy/dt and u are the same thing, so you can combine those equations to eliminate u.
Since
##F_{buoyancy}=\rho gV## and ##V=Ah##
## F_{buoyancy}=\rho gAh ##
Because ##frac_{dy}{dt}=frac_{va}{A}##
##t=\int \frac{va}{A}dy##
Since ##v##, ##a##, ##A## are constants
##t= \frac{vay}{A}##, so ##A=\frac{vay}{t}##
##V=\frac{vay}{t}h##

##F_{weight}=F_{buoyancy} + F_{drag}##
##(m_{water}+m_{cylinder})g=\rho g \frac{vay}{t}h -bv##
##(\rho V+m_{cylinder})g=\rho g \frac{vay}{t}h -bv##I suppose I do some rearranging magic for the ##v## of the drag force using the equation I got in #40?
 
  • #42
I could see something was going wrong. Just traced it to this:
lloydthebartender said:
##P_{2} = \rho gh##
That is not correct. What is the water depth just above the hole?
 
  • #43
haruspex said:
I could see something was going wrong. Just traced it to this:

That is not correct. What is the water depth just above the hole?
Is it the ##P_{2}=\rho gy## because they're at the same height (##z_{1}=z_{2}##)? But that would mean ##P_{1}=P_{2}##?
 
  • #44
lloydthebartender said:
Is it the ##P_{2}=\rho gy## because they're at the same height (##z_{1}=z_{2}##)? But that would mean ##P_{1}=P_{2}##?
No. Look at your diagram in post #24. What is the depth of water inside the cylinder?
 
  • #45
haruspex said:
No. Look at your diagram in post #24. What is the depth of water inside the cylinder?
Right, so ##y-h##; ##P_{2}=\rho g(y-h)##
 
  • #46
lloydthebartender said:
Right, so ##y-h##; ##P_{2}=\rho g(y-h)##
Yes.
 
  • #47
haruspex said:
Yes.
So I get
##\rho gy=\frac{1}{2}ρ(v+u)+ρg(y-h)##, and rearrange for ##u##?
 
  • #48
lloydthebartender said:
So I get
##\rho gy=\frac{1}{2}ρ(v+u)+ρg(y-h)##, and rearrange for ##u##?
You have forgotten to square the velocity term again.
After fixing that, rearrange for v and eliminate v using the u=dy/dt=va/A equation you had in post #37.
 
  • #49
haruspex said:
You have forgotten to square the velocity term again.
After fixing that, rearrange for v and eliminate v using the u=dy/dt=va/A equation you had in post #37.
##gy=\frac{1}{2}(v+u)^2+g(y-h)##
##2gy-2g(y-h)=(v+u)^2##
##2gh=(v+u)^2##
##\sqrt{2gh}=v+u##
##v=\sqrt{2gh}-u##
##u=\frac{va}{A}##, ##v=\frac{uA}{a}##
##\frac{uA}{a}=\sqrt{2gh}-u##
##uA=a\sqrt{2gh}-au##
##u(A+a)=a\sqrt{2gh}##
##u=\frac{a\sqrt{2gh}}{(A+a)}##
 
  • #50
lloydthebartender said:
##gy=\frac{1}{2}(v+u)^2+g(y-h)##
##2gy-2g(y-h)=(v+u)^2##
##2gh=(v+u)^2##
##\sqrt{2gh}=v+u##
##v=\sqrt{2gh}-u##
##u=\frac{va}{A}##, ##v=\frac{uA}{a}##
##\frac{uA}{a}=\sqrt{2gh}-u##
##uA=a\sqrt{2gh}-au##
##u(A+a)=a\sqrt{2gh}##
##u=\frac{a\sqrt{2gh}}{(A+a)}##
Yes!
Last step is to find the time taken. You need to think a bit here about the initial and final values of y. Start by imagining what would happen if there were no hole.
 
  • #51
haruspex said:
Yes!
Last step is to find the time taken. You need to think a bit here about the initial and final values of y. Start by imagining what would happen if there were no hole.
##y## would be 0 if there were no hole, no matter the time because it would be on the surface of the water. But also ##y## varies from 0 to the height of the cylinder if there is a hole.
Since ##\frac{dy}{dt}=\frac{va}{A}## couldn't I integrate this with ##t=\int{\frac{va}{A}dy}##?
 
  • #52
lloydthebartender said:
y would be 0 if there were no hole
No, the cylinder has weight. Apply Archimedes.
 
  • #53
haruspex said:
No, the cylinder has weight. Apply Archimedes.
I'm really not sure...##F_{b}## would be 0 to ##\rho g y##.
 
  • #54
lloydthebartender said:
I'm really not sure...##F_{b}## would be 0 to ##\rho g y##.
If you put a dish on a bucket of water does it sit on the surface, not immersed at all?
 
  • #55
haruspex said:
If you put a dish on a bucket of water does it sit on the surface, not immersed at all?
It would displace the volume of ##Ay## on the surface and the volume equal to that of the cylinder when underwater.
 
  • #56
lloydthebartender said:
It would displace the volume of ##Ay## on the surface and the volume equal to that of the cylinder when underwater.
y is a variable.
Let the mass of the empty cylinder be M. Seal up the hole and place the cylinder on the surface. How far will it sink into the water? Use Archimedes.
 
  • #57
haruspex said:
y is a variable.
Let the mass of the empty cylinder be M. Seal up the hole and place the cylinder on the surface. How far will it sink into the water? Use Archimedes.
Well it displaces it's own weight so the buoyancy is equal to ##\rho g \frac{Mg}{\rho}##
 
  • #58
lloydthebartender said:
Well it displaces it's own weight so the buoyancy is equal to ##\rho g \frac{Mg}{\rho}##
Too many g's. The buoyant force will be Mg. So what volume is displaced?
 
  • #59
haruspex said:
Too many g's. The buoyant force will be Mg. So what volume is displaced?
##\frac{M}{\rho}##?
 
  • #60
lloydthebartender said:
##\frac{M}{\rho}##?
Right.
So now let's think about what will happen when a cylinder with a small hole is placed on the water and released. The flow through the hole will be relatively slow, so the initial behaviour will be much the same as with no hole, namely, that it will immediately sink until it displaces volume ##\frac{M}{\rho}##.
What value of y will result?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
731
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K