Engineering Sinusoids- Fundamentals of Electric Circuits

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on determining the phase angle between two sinusoidal currents, i_1 = -4 sin(377t + 55) and i_2 = 5 cos(377t - 65). The user converted the equations to i_1 = 4 cos(377t + 145) and i_2 = 5 cos(377t - 65) to analyze the phase relationship. Confusion arises regarding which current leads or lags, with the user asserting that i_2 leads by 210 degrees based on their understanding, while the publisher's solution states that i_1 leads. The graphical representation of phasors is suggested as a method to clarify this phase relationship.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of sinusoidal functions and their representations
  • Knowledge of phasor diagrams and their interpretation
  • Familiarity with phase angles and their significance in AC circuits
  • Basic concepts of electrical engineering, particularly in circuit analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study phasor representation of AC signals in detail
  • Learn about the significance of leading and lagging currents in AC circuits
  • Explore the concept of phase angle calculations in sinusoidal functions
  • Review examples of phase relationships in electrical engineering textbooks
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit analysts, and anyone studying AC circuit theory will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in understanding phase relationships between sinusoidal currents.

kostantina
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Find the phase angle between i_1= - 4 sin(377t+55) and i_2= 5 cos(377t-65)

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, so I converted i_1= 4 cos(377t+145) and i_2=5cos(377t-65)

According to lectures in class the 'most' negative leads. So in this case i_2 leads by -65-145=210. However, if you look at the publishers solution it says that i_1 leads by 210. Why? Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

Here is a link to the publishers solution posted online on his student edition help/tools website:

Its problem 9.2

http://highered.mcgraw-hill.com/sites/dl/free/0073380571/938372/Chapt09PP_120121.pdf
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Draw the two as phasors and you'll see.
 
I did and according to my lectures i_2 should lead. +x axis is the +cos(wt) and the -y axis is the +sin(wt)
So i_1 = cos(377t+145) is in the II quadrant, and i_2=5cos(377-65 is in the IV quadrant). we start from the cos(wt) axis which is the + x-axis and go counterclockwise for polar angle so first we wee i_1 and then i_2. So i_1 is lagging hence i_2 leading.
Can anyone clarify this for me please?
 
i_2 leads by -65-145=210
... you missed out a minus sign.
if i2 leads by a negative amount...
 
Yes, we were told in class that result will be negative. And the most negative leads. So everything just contradicts here. This approach solved all the previous examples I tried. Now it all gets negated? Graphically how can you tell which one leads and which one follows? Its an angle 210 >180 so why not the other one lead?
 
If a phasor leads by angle A degrees then it also follows by angle 360-A degrees right?
But if it leads by -A then doesn't that mean it follows by A.

-65 degrees is the same as 295 degrees isn't it?
210 is the same as -150?

If the phasors were separated by 180 degrees, which would lead?
Which is the "most negative"?

i.e. is there a physical significance to "leading"?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K