Sit around all day gargling ice water instead of exercising or dieting

  • Thread starter Thread starter mnoodle12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ice Water
AI Thread Summary
Drinking ice water is known to burn a small number of calories, approximately 70 calories for eight glasses a day, but the effectiveness of extreme methods, such as holding ice water without swallowing, is questioned. The discussion highlights that simply holding water in the mouth does not contribute to calorie burning, as swallowing is necessary for any metabolic effect. Concerns are raised about the dangers of excessive water consumption, which can be life-threatening. Additionally, environmental factors like temperature and hydration levels can influence calorie expenditure. Overall, while ice water can contribute to calorie burning, it is not a viable substitute for exercise or dieting.
mnoodle12
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
This has been bugging me... We all know the classic problem about how the consuming ice water burns calories, although if you drink 8 glasses a day it is only 70 calories... I wonder about taking that to the extreme but it is hard to burn much more than that as one can only drink so much water.

http://health.howstuffworks.com/wellness/diet-fitness/weight-loss/question447.htm

Does the water need to enter the stomach or could one hold ice water without swallowing, then spit it out, to burn the same amount of calories? If you did this with 80 8oz glasses per day could you burn 700 calories? I imagine if anybody would rather sit around spitting out water than exercise, they need to re evaluate... but I want to know if this is possible.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to swallow, and if you drink too much water you will definitely die. Instead, you can ice bath regularly or sleep in a cold pool which will make you burn more than 70 kcal.
 
We all know the classic problem about how the consuming ice water burns calories, although if you drink 8 glasses a day it is only 70 calories...

Not so sure about the burning Calories part.

Is it a cold day, hot day, humid day? Thirsty and/or dehydrated?
Are you sweeting buckets or just on the verge of goosebumps and shivering.
That should make a difference whether your body will burn an extra 70 Calories that it would not otherwise do.

Sure, it takes 70 kcal to heat up the water from cold to body temperature, but extra calories being burnt.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
5K
2
Replies
67
Views
14K
Replies
78
Views
12K
Back
Top