I Instrument Size & Wavelength: What's the Relationship?

accdd
Messages
95
Reaction score
20
What is the relationship between the size of the instrument and the wavelength you want to measure? Both in general relativity and in other areas.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are many limits which look like Heisenberg Uncertainty relations that follow from the Cauchy-Schwartz Inequality. Like diffraction limits for a camera.
What is your particular question?
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50, vanhees71 and accdd
Why do we need large instruments to detect waves with large wavelengths? Why can't we detect smaller wavelength waves with large instruments (and viceversa)?
I have also read that some instruments must have dimensions comparable to the wavelength that allows the phenomenon of resonance. What are the general principles for sizing an instrument?
 
accdd said:
Why do we need large instruments to detect waves with large wavelengths? Why can't we detect smaller wavelength waves with large instruments (and viceversa)?
For the same reason that one cannot make a piccolo sound like a tuba.
accdd said:
I have also read that some instruments must have dimensions comparable to the wavelength that allows the phenomenon of resonance. What are the general principles for sizing an instrument?
It depends upon what you are trying to optimize. There are fundamental limits that deal with noise and information. Resonance allows maximizing signal to noise but the cost is specificity of detection.
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK, Vanadium 50, vanhees71 and 1 other person
hutchphd said:
For the same reason that one cannot make a piccolo sound like a tuba.
Did you know that the opening of The Rite of Spring by Stravinsky is a bassoon played in a high register?

 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd, Sagittarius A-Star and vanhees71
PeroK said:
id you know that the opening of The Rite of Spring by Stravinsky is a bassoon played in a high register?
Hence the rioting at the premiere.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Sagittarius A-Star, hutchphd and PeroK
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top