Size of university and Dark Matter

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the observable universe and the distances between celestial objects. It explains that an observer on a planet 4.4 billion light years away from Earth would see Earth as it was 4.4 billion years ago and could observe other distant galaxies that are causally disconnected from Earth. The conversation clarifies that the most distant matter observable from Earth is over 45 billion light years away, and distances in the universe are continually increasing. Dark matter and dark energy are mentioned as separate concepts, with dark matter slowing down cosmic expansion and dark energy accelerating it, neither of which directly relates to the distances discussed. The thread emphasizes the complexity of cosmological distances and encourages further questions on related topics.
TenOC
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have a Physic 201 understanding of physic.

I understand that the most distant star (galaxy) that we can see from the Earth is 4.4 billion light years (the time of the big bang) away. I think this is called the viewing horizon.

Assume a person on a planet 4.4 billion light years from Earth (let us call it B1) looks back at earth. I expect he will see the earth.

What does he see if he looks in the opposite direction from earth? I expect he will see B2 – 4.4 billion light years away.

How far is B2 from the earth? – 8.8 Billion light years ?

This analogy could go on for B3, B4, B5 …..

Could this account for dark matter?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
(1) It is more like 14.4 than 4.4
(2) this has nothing to do with dark matter. I would suggest you read up a bit on dark matter.
(3) Yes, someone at the edge of our observable universe will have us at one edge of their observable universe and will be able to see stuff at the other side of their observable universe that is, and always will be, causally disconnected from the Earth.
 
Actually, the most remote galaxies currently known were less than a billion years older than the BB when the photons we now observe were emitted. That translates into a little over 13 billion light years. An observer currently 4.4 billion light years distant would observe the Earth as it appeared 4.4 billion years ago. If that observer looks in the opposite direction, the most remote galaxies would appear to be as they were about 9 billion years ago. Cosmological distances are difficult to picture. CMB photons we currently observe, for instance, originated a mere 42 million light years from earth, but, took nearly 14 billion years to reach earth.
 
Yes but what does any of this have to do with the question asked - about the size of the University? Is this something to do with distance learning?
 
TenOC said:
Could this account for dark matter?

Could what account for dark matter?
 
TenOC said:
...I understand that the most distant star (galaxy) that we can see from the Earth is X billion light years … away. I think this is called the viewing horizon.

Assume a person on a planet X billion light years from Earth (let us call it B1) looks back at earth. I expect he will see the earth.

What does he see if he looks in the opposite direction from earth? I expect he will see B2 – X billion light years away.

How far is B2 from the earth? – 2X Billion light years ?

Yes. What you say makes sense. Actually the most distant MATTER we can see from Earth is estimated to NOW be a little over 45 billion LY from us*. We see that matter when it was still hot gas and had not yet formed stars.
But we expect that matter has in the course of many years formed galaxies and stars and planets just as our matter has.
If there are observers there and they look towards Earth they will see our matter, 45 billion LY from them, as it was in early times, a glowing hot gas. That glow is what has become the "microwave background" that we see and they see.

And if they look in the opposite direction (as you imagined and said in your post) they will see matter that is 45 billion LY from them and 90 billion LY from us.

So what you said about 2X distance was right. We do not know how big the universe is. We know that it is very very big, much more than 90 billion LY. Maybe infinite, maybe finite, but in either case extremely large. And these distances are increasing.

You also asked about "Dark Matter". That is a separate topic. It is not related to this SIZE question--the first question you asked.
You can make a separate post to ask about dark matter. Also you should ask about dark energy.

Dark matter and dark energy are two very different ideas. Dark matter exists as a real material and it SLOWS DOWN expansion by its gravity. Dark energy may be a name for something that is not exactly an energy. We don't know the cause of the "dark energy effect" which is ACCELERATING the expansion. So DM and DE are different things and DM slows expansion while DE speeds it up. NEITHER of them directly causes what you said about distances to stars and planets beyond the visible horizon.

Welcome to Physicsforum. Asking questions is the best thing for us. Thanks for starting off with a good question about distances :smile:

*ask questions to find out how distances are defined. that distance is 45 billion LY distance now, but a long time ago (when the light started traveling to us) it was much smaller. Distances change size over time, even while the light is traveling.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top