Size sample required to construct a 95% C.I. with margin of error

  • Thread starter Thread starter goodz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Error Margin
goodz
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
N = 8
Mean = 2.10
stDev = 0.537

What size sample is required to construct a 95% confidence interval with a margin of error of 0.3?
try n = 12, t(.975) with 11 deg. of freedom = 2.2001
so n = ( (.537* 2.2001) / (.3))^2 = 15.5

try n = 14, i get n = 14.95
n = 15, n = 14.74
Why is this a trial and error?
What I don't get is what are we trying to get n to equal?

the answer: n must be between 14 and 15 so, use n = 15.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First question: what is N = 8 in your question? Second question: are you trying to look for the sample size to use to generate a CI for a mean? If so, have you not encountered the formula

<br /> n = \left(\frac{z \times \sigma}{E}\right)^2<br />

(E is the margin of error)? The general rule is to use this and round the result to the next highest integer. If you use the method you suggest (which I haven't seen in any text)
* you are correct, you get a game of guessing
* it isn't obvious to me that it would ever converge - that is, if you repeated the same step with 15, then with
the result of that calculation, and so on, I am not sure you would ever zero in on a single value.

The benefit of the formula I presented is that it does give an idea of an appropriate sample size, IF, your guess at the size of the standard deviation is in the correct ballpark.
 
Last edited:
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top