Can Point Charges Be Used to Approximate Charged Bodies?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sahilmm15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    bodies Charged
AI Thread Summary
Point charges can be used to approximate charged bodies when the sizes of those bodies are significantly smaller than the distances separating them. The electric fields of different shapes, such as cubes and tetrahedrons, vary, but at great distances, these differences become negligible. The term "sizes of charged bodies" refers to the largest dimension across the object, although this is not precisely defined. To apply the point charge approximation effectively, one must be far enough away from the charged body. This approach simplifies calculations by avoiding complex integrals.
sahilmm15
Messages
100
Reaction score
27
"If the sizes of charged bodies are very small as compared to the distances between them, we treat them as point charges". Can you explain me the statement. And what does "sizes of charged bodies" refer here. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The electric field of a charged cube, for example, is different from a charged tetrahedron. Very far from the object, though, the differences are negligible, and the difference from the field of a point charge is negligible. So we can just treat it as a point charge and save ourselves from some nasty integrals.

The size of the body, in this context, isn't really precisely defined, since we're talking about an approximation. It's something like the largest distance there is across the object. You need to be much further away than that.
 
Ibix said:
The electric field of a charged cube, for example, is different from a charged tetrahedron. Very far from the object, though, the differences are negligible, and the difference from the field of a point charge is negligible. So we can just treat it as a point charge and save ourselves from some nasty integrals.

The size of the body, in this context, isn't really precisely defined, since we're talking about an approximation. It's something like the largest distance there is across the object. You need to be much further away than that.
Thanks for the reply. I appreciate it.
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top