Sizing capacitors for smoothing signals

AI Thread Summary
Sizing capacitors for smoothing voltage signals involves considering the expected fluctuations in output voltage and the load across the capacitor. A larger capacitance generally provides better smoothing, but the specific size depends on the circuit's design and the anticipated variations. Capacitors can discharge quickly if needed, and their discharge rates are influenced by the load. The choice between dielectric and ceramic capacitors may affect performance, and proper connections prevent unwanted discharge back into the regulator. Ultimately, analyzing the entire circuit is crucial for determining the appropriate capacitor size and ensuring clean voltage output.
sherrellbc
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
In general, by what considerations guide the decision to size a capactior to smooth voltage signals?

For example, if I were to use a 3.3V regulator in a circuit design, what size cap should be set in place to ensure a smooth regulated voltage? My attempt at answering my own question would bet to get an appropriate voltage rating (~10V, for this case maybe?) and, presummably, larger capacitance is better? I know that smaller capacitances will discharge very quickly if the need ever arises (i.e. fluctuations in the output voltage require cap discharge).
-What keeps a capacitor from discharging back back into the regulator?

However, at the same time, I know that discharge rates of capacitors depend largely on the load across its terminals. That being said, is a direct analysis per design in order for capacitance sizing?

What about the use of dielectric capacitors versus ceramic (non-polar) capacitors?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What keeps a capacitor from discharging back back into the regulator?
The regulator (or the connection between regulator and capacitor), hopefully.

and, presummably, larger capacitance is better?
Usually, yes.

what size cap should be set in place to ensure a smooth regulated voltage?
That depends on the fluctuations you expect.
Maximal current for the capacitors is also a design choice, and depends on the load.
 
mfb said:
The regulator (or the connection between regulator and capacitor), That depends on the fluctuations you expect.
Maximal current for the capacitors is also a design choice, and depends on the load.

Where would such fluctuations originate from? I was considering placing smoothing capacitors across the terminals of the a voltage regulator to ensure output is kept very clean and any high frequency fluctuations (inherent circuit noise?) is kept filtered out.

For example, say mains voltage is stepped down to around 12V, which is then in turn clamped to 5V and again to 3.3V for various applications. What order of fluctuations are to be expected in a configuration like this? If each clamping stage is filtered by such a capacitor that is the purpose of this thread.

What about if the initial supply were to come from a battery. Are capactiors required in this case, or is the voltage supplied by batteries very clean to begin with?
 
sherrellbc said:
Where would such fluctuations originate from?
That depends on your setup.
A variable load, a variable input voltage for the regulator (no regulator is perfect...), induced electric fields in the circuit, noise in the circuit components, ...

For example, say mains voltage is stepped down to around 12V, which is then in turn clamped to 5V and again to 3.3V for various applications. What order of fluctuations are to be expected in a configuration like this? If each clamping stage is filtered by such a capacitor that is the purpose of this thread.
It is impossible to answer it without analyzing the whole circuit.

What about if the initial supply were to come from a battery. Are capactiors required in this case, or is the voltage supplied by batteries very clean to begin with?
I would not expect significant variations from the source, but what about your load?
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top