Graphing a Function with No Local Minimum at x=2 and Differentiable at x=2

  • Thread starter Thread starter afcwestwarrior
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph Sketch
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on sketching a function that is differentiable at x=2 and has no local minimum at that point. Participants express confusion about the requirements, noting that there are infinitely many functions that meet these criteria. Suggestions include considering various graph types, such as horizontal lines, which could satisfy the conditions. There is a clarification that the original problem may have been misinterpreted, possibly referring to local maxima instead of minima. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the flexibility in function selection while adhering to the specified mathematical properties.
afcwestwarrior
Messages
453
Reaction score
0
sketch the graph of a function that has no local minimum at 2 and is differentiable at 2

this is confusing, how come this is an upside down parabola, it makes sense, but how do i know what kind of graph to draw
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There must be more to the question. Infinitely many functions have no local minima at 2 and are differentiable there. What else is given in the problem or in the discussion that precedes the problem?
 
mmm, no what i wrote it wrong i meant local maximum, my bad.
 
Well, maybe when they said sketch the graph of *a* function, they meant any of the infinitely many functions that obey the criteria. Woudn't a horizontal line work?
 
Again, are you sure you have written the problem correctly? Almost any graph except the upside down parabola you mention would work. Are you sure the problem did not say "has a local maximum at x=2" rather than "has no local maximum"?
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K