Sketch the wave, showing both x < 0 and x > 0.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the amplitude and phase of a wave function for x > 0, given the wave function for x < 0. The continuity conditions at x = 0 require that both the wave function and its derivative match on either side of the boundary. The equations provided indicate that the amplitude for x > 0 may differ from that of x < 0, necessitating a separate coefficient. Participants suggest solving for the amplitude (B) and phase (φ) using the continuity conditions and recommend plotting the results for verification. The overall goal is to sketch the complete wave across both regions.
aryan
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

[/B]A wave is represented by the wave function:
y = A cos(2πx/λ + π/3) for x < 0. For x > 0, the wavelength is λ/2. By applying continuity conditions at x = 0, find the amplitude (in terms of A) and phase of the wave in the region x > 0. Sketch the wave, showing both x < 0 and x > 0.

Homework Equations

[/B]y = A cos(2πx/λ + π/3) for x<0
and A cos(4πx/λ + φ) for x >0

The Attempt at a Solution

[/B]I guess using the equation above we can make this. How to apply continuity condition and solve this? I have a little idea over this. can anyone please guide me through the entire question. Thank You.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The continuity condition requires that y(0-) = y(0+) and y'(0-) = y'(0+). I think you need to have a different coefficient for the positive x, since the amplitude may be different.
## y(0-) = A cos(\pi/3), y(0+) = B cos(\phi)##
## y'(0-) = -\frac{2\pi}{\lambda} A sin(\pi/3), y'(0+) = -\frac{4\pi}{\lambda}B sin(\phi)##
 
  • Like
Likes aryan
Now from the above two equations i shall get the value of B and ϕ. Right?
 
Hopefully. Then I would recommend plotting the results to make sure they look consistent.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top