MHB Sketching graphs in polar coordinates

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around sketching the polar graph of the equation r = 2 + 4cos(θ). The user struggles with understanding the placement of points, particularly the inner loop, and how a negative radius affects the Cartesian coordinates. They correctly identify that a radius of -2 at θ = π translates to the Cartesian point (2,0), but they seek clarification on the logic behind this conversion. The explanation emphasizes that in polar coordinates, a negative radius indicates a point in the opposite direction along the x-axis. Ultimately, understanding this concept is crucial for accurately plotting the graph.
shamieh
Messages
538
Reaction score
0
I don't understand why I am screwing this up so bad.

Sketch the graph of the equation $$r = 2 + 4cos(\theta)$$ in polar coordinates.

So I did:

$$0 = 2 + 4cos(\theta) $$
$$= -\frac{1}{2} = cos(\theta)$$

Then got $$cos(\theta)$$ is $$-\frac{1}{2}$$ @ $$\frac{2\pi}{3}$$ and @$$ \frac{4\pi}{3} $$

Then i plotted points to get

0 ,6
pi/2 , 2
pi, -2
3pi/2 , 2
2pi, 6

And I'm not understanding where they are getting the 2 for the like inner loop part of the centroid... My graph is on the left... The one on the right is what its supposed to look like.

View attachment 2134

I'm getting everything the same except I'm not getting the inner loop
 

Attachments

  • plotting.png
    plotting.png
    12 KB · Views: 115
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
A radius of -2 at the angle of $\pi$ would be at the Cartesian point (2,0)...do you see why?
 
MarkFL said:
A radius of -2 at the angle of $\pi$ would be at the Cartesian point (2,0)...do you see why?
No I don't actually. Why is that? I mean I know that it should be (2,0) I just don't understand the logic behind it or why, but I know it obviously is because I'm getting the wrong graph lol.
 
Last edited:
The polar point $(r,\pi)$ will lie along the $x$-axis. If $r$ is positive, then the point is on the negative $x$-axis and if $r$ is negative, the point will be on the positive $x$-axis. Think of the rectangular translation for this point:

$$x=r\cos(\pi)=-r$$

$$y=r\sin(\pi)=0$$

Hence, the polar point:

$$(r,\pi)$$

is the rectangular point:

$$(-r,0)$$
 
Thread 'Problem with calculating projections of curl using rotation of contour'
Hello! I tried to calculate projections of curl using rotation of coordinate system but I encountered with following problem. Given: ##rot_xA=\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial z}=0## ##rot_yA=\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial x}=1## ##rot_zA=\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial y}=0## I rotated ##yz##-plane of this coordinate system by an angle ##45## degrees about ##x##-axis and used rotation matrix to...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K