Skydiving Balloon: Why Vacuum Isn't Used

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter maggiomail
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balloon
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the impracticality of using vacuum to fill skydiving balloons, primarily due to the need for rigid materials that can withstand significant pressure differentials. Helium is preferred over vacuum because it is less dense than air at the same pressure, allowing for effective lift. The conversation also highlights the challenges posed by extreme temperatures and radiation at altitudes of 300 miles, where the atmosphere is extremely thin yet hot. The use of hydrogen as an alternative to helium is mentioned, but safety concerns are noted due to its flammability.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gas laws and buoyancy principles
  • Knowledge of material science related to pressure resistance
  • Familiarity with atmospheric layers and their characteristics
  • Awareness of the properties and risks associated with hydrogen and helium
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of materials suitable for high-altitude balloon construction
  • Study the effects of temperature and pressure at various altitudes in the atmosphere
  • Learn about the physics of buoyancy and gas expansion in different environments
  • Investigate the safety measures and engineering practices for using hydrogen in balloons
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, materials scientists, skydiving enthusiasts, and anyone interested in high-altitude ballooning and the physics of gases.

maggiomail
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Why can't we fill the balloon with the lightest substance available, i.e. vacuum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Helium balloons explode if they go sufficiently high, presumedly from excess pressure?
It can't be as simple as to install a pressure relief valve..
Wonder how big a part radiation and subzero temperatures would play, say, 300 miles up?
 
maggiomail said:
Why can't we fill the balloon with the lightest substance available, i.e. vacuum?
The balloon would have to be rigid and withstand huge forces. With known materials, that would make it heavier than the air it displaces.
 
Could fill it with Hydrogen, which is lighter than Helium.

The balloon will not burst at the desired height because it is designed with enough surplus capacity to contain the gas after it expands.
 
Pkruse said:
Could fill it with Hydrogen, which is lighter than Helium.

Remember the Hindenburg? :wink:
 
maggiomail said:
Why can't we fill the balloon with the lightest substance available, i.e. vacuum?

They don't use helium because it's light. They use it because it's less dense than air at the same pressure.


If they use a vacuum what would the pressure differential be between inside and outside?
 
I like the concept of filling something with vacuum.
 
maggiomail said:
Wonder how big a part radiation and subzero temperatures would play, say, 300 miles up?
300 miles up, we have space with an extremely good vacuum (most satellites are there, flying for years without falling down). The density is way too low to use balloons there.

Helium balloons explode if they go sufficiently high, presumedly from excess pressure?
You can increase their maximal height with a valve, but that does not reduce the mass of the hull - at some point, air pressure is too low to generate the required lifting force.
 
maggiomail said:
Helium balloons explode if they go sufficiently high, presumedly from excess pressure?
It can't be as simple as to install a pressure relief valve..
Wonder how big a part radiation and subzero temperatures would play, say, 300 miles up?

Interestingly enough, what atmosphere does exist 300 miles up is actually extremely hot. That's near the upper end of the thermosphere, which can reach temperatures into the thousands of degrees during the day. The density is so low however that objects will not experience this temperature - the rate of heat transfer is simply too low.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
15K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K