Skydiving Balloon: Why Vacuum Isn't Used

  • Thread starter Thread starter maggiomail
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balloon
AI Thread Summary
Vacuum cannot be used to fill skydiving balloons because it requires a rigid structure to withstand significant pressure differentials, making it heavier than the air it displaces. Helium is preferred over hydrogen not for being lighter, but because it is less dense than air at the same pressure, allowing for effective lift. Balloons designed for high altitudes account for gas expansion and are equipped with pressure relief systems to prevent bursting. At 300 miles up, the atmosphere is extremely thin, making balloon use impractical due to insufficient lifting force. Additionally, while temperatures can be high in the thermosphere, the low density means objects do not experience significant heat transfer.
maggiomail
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Why can't we fill the balloon with the lightest substance available, i.e. vacuum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Helium balloons explode if they go sufficiently high, presumedly from excess pressure?
It can't be as simple as to install a pressure relief valve..
Wonder how big a part radiation and subzero temperatures would play, say, 300 miles up?
 
maggiomail said:
Why can't we fill the balloon with the lightest substance available, i.e. vacuum?
The balloon would have to be rigid and withstand huge forces. With known materials, that would make it heavier than the air it displaces.
 
Could fill it with Hydrogen, which is lighter than Helium.

The balloon will not burst at the desired height because it is designed with enough surplus capacity to contain the gas after it expands.
 
Pkruse said:
Could fill it with Hydrogen, which is lighter than Helium.

Remember the Hindenburg? :wink:
 
maggiomail said:
Why can't we fill the balloon with the lightest substance available, i.e. vacuum?

They don't use helium because it's light. They use it because it's less dense than air at the same pressure.


If they use a vacuum what would the pressure differential be between inside and outside?
 
I like the concept of filling something with vacuum.
 
maggiomail said:
Wonder how big a part radiation and subzero temperatures would play, say, 300 miles up?
300 miles up, we have space with an extremely good vacuum (most satellites are there, flying for years without falling down). The density is way too low to use balloons there.

Helium balloons explode if they go sufficiently high, presumedly from excess pressure?
You can increase their maximal height with a valve, but that does not reduce the mass of the hull - at some point, air pressure is too low to generate the required lifting force.
 
maggiomail said:
Helium balloons explode if they go sufficiently high, presumedly from excess pressure?
It can't be as simple as to install a pressure relief valve..
Wonder how big a part radiation and subzero temperatures would play, say, 300 miles up?

Interestingly enough, what atmosphere does exist 300 miles up is actually extremely hot. That's near the upper end of the thermosphere, which can reach temperatures into the thousands of degrees during the day. The density is so low however that objects will not experience this temperature - the rate of heat transfer is simply too low.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top