Skydiving Balloon: Why Vacuum Isn't Used

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter maggiomail
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balloon
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of using vacuum to fill a skydiving balloon instead of lighter gases like helium or hydrogen. Participants explore the implications of pressure differentials, material limitations, and environmental conditions at high altitudes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why vacuum cannot be used in balloons, suggesting that it would require rigid materials to withstand external pressure, potentially making the balloon heavier than the air it displaces.
  • Others mention that helium balloons can explode at high altitudes due to excess pressure, raising concerns about the effectiveness of pressure relief valves.
  • There is a proposal to use hydrogen instead of helium, which is lighter, but this raises historical concerns related to the Hindenburg disaster.
  • Some participants note that helium is chosen not solely for its lightness but because it is less dense than air at the same pressure.
  • One participant highlights that at 300 miles up, the vacuum is so extreme that balloons would not be effective due to insufficient atmospheric density to provide lift.
  • There is a discussion about the temperature conditions at high altitudes, particularly in the thermosphere, where despite high temperatures, the low density results in minimal heat transfer to objects.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the use of vacuum versus lighter gases, the implications of pressure differentials, and the environmental conditions at high altitudes. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about material properties, the effects of pressure at various altitudes, and the specific conditions that would affect balloon performance at high elevations.

maggiomail
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Why can't we fill the balloon with the lightest substance available, i.e. vacuum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Helium balloons explode if they go sufficiently high, presumedly from excess pressure?
It can't be as simple as to install a pressure relief valve..
Wonder how big a part radiation and subzero temperatures would play, say, 300 miles up?
 
maggiomail said:
Why can't we fill the balloon with the lightest substance available, i.e. vacuum?
The balloon would have to be rigid and withstand huge forces. With known materials, that would make it heavier than the air it displaces.
 
Could fill it with Hydrogen, which is lighter than Helium.

The balloon will not burst at the desired height because it is designed with enough surplus capacity to contain the gas after it expands.
 
Pkruse said:
Could fill it with Hydrogen, which is lighter than Helium.

Remember the Hindenburg? :wink:
 
maggiomail said:
Why can't we fill the balloon with the lightest substance available, i.e. vacuum?

They don't use helium because it's light. They use it because it's less dense than air at the same pressure.


If they use a vacuum what would the pressure differential be between inside and outside?
 
I like the concept of filling something with vacuum.
 
maggiomail said:
Wonder how big a part radiation and subzero temperatures would play, say, 300 miles up?
300 miles up, we have space with an extremely good vacuum (most satellites are there, flying for years without falling down). The density is way too low to use balloons there.

Helium balloons explode if they go sufficiently high, presumedly from excess pressure?
You can increase their maximal height with a valve, but that does not reduce the mass of the hull - at some point, air pressure is too low to generate the required lifting force.
 
maggiomail said:
Helium balloons explode if they go sufficiently high, presumedly from excess pressure?
It can't be as simple as to install a pressure relief valve..
Wonder how big a part radiation and subzero temperatures would play, say, 300 miles up?

Interestingly enough, what atmosphere does exist 300 miles up is actually extremely hot. That's near the upper end of the thermosphere, which can reach temperatures into the thousands of degrees during the day. The density is so low however that objects will not experience this temperature - the rate of heat transfer is simply too low.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
15K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K