I Slackline Balance: How is it Possible?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Komanchi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balance
AI Thread Summary
Balancing on a slackline involves moving the point of contact relative to the center of gravity, while on a tightrope, the center of gravity is adjusted relative to the contact point. The discussion highlights that slacklines provide more responsiveness but can lead to overcontrol, making balance trickier. The ability to shift the contact point momentarily aids in maintaining balance on a slackline, but this can introduce complications, such as torque that may lead to falling. Ultimately, balancing on a tightrope is generally easier due to its rigidity, which allows for more efficient force application. Understanding these dynamics clarifies the mechanics behind balancing on different types of lines.
Komanchi
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I know bicycles and other single track vehicles stay upright with countersteering only, especially at lower speeds. But the guy rides his bike on a slackline that is obviously not wide enough to countersteer. Does his body movements work because there is slack in the rope so when he moves the point of contact go back under the system's center of gravity? Because doing that on a normal ground or a really tight rope wouldn't work I guess since professional riders turn their front wheels at a 45 degree angle and go back and forth to keep balance when at a standstill. I just can't fathom how he does it.

The video is this:

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Body movements work both on a slack line and on a tight rope. With a slack line, you are moving the point of contact right and left relative to your center of gravity. With a tight rope, you are pushing your center of gravity right or left relative to the point of contact.
 
jbriggs444 said:
Body movements work both on a slack line and on a tight rope. With a slack line, you are moving the point of contact right and left relative to your center of gravity. With a tight rope, you are pushing your center of gravity right or left relative to the point of contact.
My guess would be that the main objective in order to keep balance in either scenario is bringing the center of gravity above the contact patch since even with the slack line, the point of contact will move back to where it was anyway, you can't change it permanently.

But bringing the center of gravity above the point of contact would be easier I think on a rigid rope since it doesn't have any give, so it pushes back on the tires with a higher efficiency.

Do you reckon he could to the same on a tight rope without any slack?
 
Komanchi said:
Do you reckon he could to the same on a tight rope without any slack?
Yes. Far easier on a tight rope.
 
  • Like
Likes Komanchi
jbriggs444 said:
Yes. Far easier on a tight rope.
Why can't people even pros can't stay upright when stationary if body movement works do you have any idea? They go back and forth when they do track stands
 
Komanchi said:
Why can't people even pros can't stay upright when stationary if body movement works do you have any idea? They go back and forth when they do track stands
I'm sure they could. It's just that forward and back works even better.
 
  • Like
Likes Komanchi
jbriggs444 said:
Yes. Far easier on a tight rope.
Wouldn't the ability to move the contact point under the bike make it easier to retain balance on the slack line, even though it happens momentarily?
 
If you've ever try balancing on a slack versus a tight rope, you'll notice the change in required reflexes.
 
  • Like
Likes Komanchi
jbriggs444 said:
Yes. Far easier on a tight rope.
Doesn't the ability to move the contact patch momentarily make it easier on a slackline though?
 
  • #10
Komanchi said:
Doesn't the ability to move the contact patch momentarily make it easier on a slackline though?
If you were in the middle of a very long (or very slack) line so that your center of gravity is well below the straight line between the support points then a slack line gives you more responsiveness. You can easily move your feet under your center of gravity. That responsiveness comes at a price -- it makes it easy to overcontrol. But that's not the tricky part. The tricky part is with a line that is only somewhat slack.

If you are in the middle of a not quite so slack line then the slackness has an effect which is difficult to deal with. It is difficult to explain. Let us dispense with the bicycle and consider an acrobat on a slack wire. Suppose that he is leaning right and wants to correct, centering himself again. He shifts his feet right. Now the support from the wire is further right and is pushing his center of gravity leftward. That's great, but there is a problem. It's also a clockwise torque tending to rotate him into the fall. He's corrected one problem and created another.

You have to be careful enough while taking care of your rotation so that you still have some freedom to keep your center of gravity where it belongs.

It's been a long time since I was an agile youth standing on cables or rolling on barrels. It's easier to feel what you have to do than to explain it.
 
  • Like
Likes Komanchi
  • #11
jbriggs444 said:
If you were in the middle of a very long (or very slack) line so that your center of gravity is well below the straight line between the support points then a slack line gives you more responsiveness. You can easily move your feet under your center of gravity. That responsiveness comes at a price -- it makes it easy to overcontrol. But that's not the tricky part. The tricky part is with a line that is only somewhat slack.

If you are in the middle of a not quite so slack line then the slackness has an effect which is difficult to deal with. It is difficult to explain. Let us dispense with the bicycle and consider an acrobat on a slack wire. Suppose that he is leaning right and wants to correct, centering himself again. He shifts his feet right. Now the support from the wire is further right and is pushing his center of gravity leftward. That's great, but there is a problem. It's also a clockwise torque tending to rotate him into the fall. He's corrected one problem and created another.

You have to be careful enough while taking care of your rotation so that you still have some freedom to keep your center of gravity where it belongs.

It's been a long time since I was an agile youth standing on cables or rolling on barrels. It's easier to feel what you have to do than to explain it.
I guess the line in the video is in the category of "somewhat slack" which is very tricky

The main mechanism that is responsible for him keeping the balance is not the line moving under the center of gravity but moving the center of gravity back in line with the slack line correct? Which is easier to do on a tightrope since it applies the force back on the bicycle with greater efficiency and without delay.

So we are certain that if he can do this on the slack line, he sure can do it on a tight rope shaped more like a line so that his tires won't slip.

Thank you very much this really helped!
 
Back
Top