'Slackline' equipment load formula (weighted line between 2 fixed points)

AI Thread Summary
An accurate formula for calculating the load on slackline equipment should consider the length of the line, the sag, and the weight applied. Current formulas often assume a thin string model, which does not account for the significant width of slackline webbing that can transmit both torque and tension. This oversight complicates the calculations, as the interaction of these forces must be factored in. The discussion highlights the need for a more comprehensive approach to slackline load calculations. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for ensuring safety and performance in slacklining.
eliotwebb
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have a real world sports question I need help with:

I am looking for an accurate formula to calculate the load of Slackline equipment (will explain shortly), based on:

- The length of the line
- The sag of the line
- The weight on the line

Slacklining is like tight rope walking, but on a slack ribbon (usually 1 inch wide webbing)

There are various arguments on which is the best formula:

http://slack.e30tuner.com/articles_linetension.php

http://forum.slackline.com/archive/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&t=1279&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0

http://www.slacklineexpress.com/force.php

I thought it was worth a post to see what you all think.

Thanks for having a look,

Eliot
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
G'dday, Elliotwebb and welcome to Physics Forums.

Firstly let me admit to knowing nothing about the sport of slackline walking.

However from your description of the webbing and the picture in your third reference I would say that all are seriously deficient.

I say this because the line has appreciable width, whereas all the links assume a 'thin' stringlike model.

The point of this is that the width of the webbing is sufficient to transmit torque as well as tension (you can see that in the picture).
The addition of stresses due to both torque and tension being present is more complicated and clearly depends upon the relative values of each.

go well
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
7K
Back
Top