Slider Crank Mechanism Torque Question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the torque required for a slider crank mechanism designed to rock a keg for carbonation purposes. The calculated torque is 88 lb-in, assuming no weight or friction on link AB and a maximum rotation speed of 60 RPM. Participants suggest considering inertia loads and the differences between degrees and radians in calculations. The design aims to facilitate CO2 absorption into the liquid by gently rocking the keg, with suggestions for simplifying the mechanism to improve efficiency.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of torque calculations in mechanical systems
  • Familiarity with slider crank mechanisms
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions in engineering
  • Basic principles of carbonation in beverage systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research torque calculations for rotating mechanisms
  • Explore the design and analysis of slider crank mechanisms
  • Learn about the effects of inertia on motor sizing
  • Investigate methods for optimizing carbonation processes in kegs
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, hobbyists designing carbonation systems, and anyone interested in the mechanics of slider crank mechanisms.

bugdry
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I hope that it is okay for me to ask this here. It has been a long time since i did mechanism analysis.

I have what I hope is a quick question. I calculate the torque required to rotate crank AB and therefore lift up the link BC to be 88lb-in. I assumed that link AB has no weight, no friction at the joints and i kept the length of BC at 10.5". I am trying to determine the minimum motor size i need to lift link BC, with link AB moving at a maximum of 60rpm.

I know i am also missing the inertia load to start the rotation. But i am just going for a ball park torque figure for now.

Thanks in advance for your help.
 

Attachments

  • TEST MECHANISM 1 - Sheet1.jpg
    TEST MECHANISM 1 - Sheet1.jpg
    19 KB · Views: 367
  • sample data.xlsx
    sample data.xlsx
    11.1 KB · Views: 293
Engineering news on Phys.org
You can start by looking at the values in your "Torque at theta" row, and ask if they make sense. Then look into how your spreadsheet calculates trig functions.

Hint: Consider the difference between degrees and radians.
 
Thanks. I have updated the equations to using radians, but it didn't change the torque at all. It would make more sense to me for the torque required to be 89lb-ft, not 89lb-in.

I am trying to solve this with trig. But my problem is that it doesn't seem like the usual slider crank mechanism, with the slider able to pivot. But in my design, I need the long link to pivot.
 
Hi,
May I ask: what is the purpose of this device ? It seems to me BC just wiggles and points A and C are fixed in position ...
 
BvU said:
Hi,
May I ask: what is the purpose of this device ? It seems to me BC just wiggles and points A and C are fixed in position ...

It is to gently rock a keg after it has been filled. With the CO2 feeding into the keg, you gently rock them and it can force carbonate a keg in about 30minutes. Instead of rolling them across my legs while I sit on a chair, I wanted to be able to strap the keg into this and run it for 30minutes while I work on other things. Mainly i thought it would be cool to design and make it.
 

Attachments

  • keg shaker.JPG
    keg shaker.JPG
    44.5 KB · Views: 274
  • keg shaker 2.JPG
    keg shaker 2.JPG
    39.4 KB · Views: 243
Ah !
So why not counterbalance the crank mechanism purplish wheel ? Less energy loss, less wear, etc ...
 
I don't remember how. Its been 15 or so years since i dealt with anything but static designs. lol
 
bugdry said:
updated the equations to using radians, but it didn't change the torque at all
Strange ! It did make a big change for me: from

1607614379823.png


to

1607614710052.png


or one period of a sine when plotted. Makes a whole lot more sense.

But this is the static torque at 0 rpm !
 
BvU said:
Strange ! It did make a big change for me: from

View attachment 274062

to

View attachment 274064

or one period of a sine when plotted. Makes a whole lot more sense.

But this is the static torque at 0 rpm !
Ah ok, yes sorry. I meant that the max torque didn't really change.
 
  • #10
ok, well I thought this would be a pretty straight forward project. I guess not. I will keep shaking them by hand. Thanks for the help guys.
 
  • #11
Wouldn't it be simpler to scale up this Weebles toy big enough to hold a keg?

1607629363631.png
 
  • #12
Is it necessary to move the keg up and down ?

Why not use a crank and shaft to just swing the bottom end ?
(or the top :smile: )

Forces required are a small fraction of what's needed to lift the things !
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
  • #13
I was just thinking that last night. I was like there has to be an easier way to do this. I am going to work on that idea today. The mechanism just needs to slosh the liquid around in the keg to facilitate the absorption of CO2 into the liquid.
 
  • #14
bugdry said:
I was just thinking that last night. I was like there has to be an easier way to do this. I am going to work on that idea today. The mechanism just needs to slosh the liquid around in the keg to facilitate the absorption of CO2 into the liquid.
Fabricate that slot and make it work properly may be difficult.

An additional idea:
http://507movements.com/mm_419.html
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
14K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
14K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K