Sliding Friction between two Plates as a function of surface roughess

AI Thread Summary
As surface roughness decreases, static friction between two plates can paradoxically increase due to enhanced intermolecular forces acting over a larger contact area. While rough surfaces create less contact area and can slide more easily, finely polished surfaces allow for greater molecular interlocking, leading to higher resistance to movement. The molecular interactions become significant as the smooth surfaces engage more intimately, increasing friction. Additionally, the geometry of the surfaces plays a crucial role; when the peaks of one surface fit into the valleys of another, it creates additional resistance. Understanding these dynamics at the molecular level is essential for grasping the complexities of friction in manufacturing contexts.
MrDomino
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
For our Manufacturing class, one of our take-home quizzes is to find out why, as surface roughness continues to decrease (think of very finely polished materials) the static friction between the plates as you try and slide them will increase. Basically, really rough surfaces will be hard to slide and really fine surfaces will also be hard to slide.

We can use any sources and the explanation must be in-depth (driven down to pretty much the molecular level).

As of now, we're having difficulty finding information and I figured some of you guys here might know where to look (we've been searching Google Scholar, Web of Science, etc.).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The intermolecular forces are stronger if there is more area over which to act.

Let us consider a rough surface with grooves, the surface of which looks like this in cross-section:

_----_----_----_----_----_

The contact surface area between too such surface would be decreased, but the the grooves are not wide enough for the hills in between to go in them and catch.

Another possible surface would be like this:

__-__-__-__-__-__-__

When two of these surfaces are in contact, the hills of one enter the valleys of another. This results in a resistance to lateral movement. It is friction, but a different kind.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top