Smith Chart: Calculating Impedance with Loss/Leakage

  • Thread starter Thread starter Magna Visus
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of the Smith Chart for calculating impedance in various types of transmission lines, particularly focusing on lines with leakage or loss. Participants explore methods for adapting calculations to account for these losses and the implications for impedance matching.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their approach to using the Smith Chart for calculating reduced impedance and questions how to adjust for leakage/loss in the line.
  • Another participant suggests that the Smith Chart is more suitable for lossless lines and proposes using short sections of line with lumped components to model losses, indicating a method involving small phase angle rotations.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes the practicality of using numerical methods over the Smith Chart, while acknowledging its value for teaching concepts related to impedance and admittance transformations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the effectiveness of the Smith Chart for lossy lines, with no consensus on the best approach to incorporate losses into calculations.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the nature of losses and the applicability of the Smith Chart in various scenarios remain unresolved. The discussion reflects a range of experiences and methodologies without definitive conclusions.

Magna Visus
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Hello guys,

I am using the Smith Chart to calculate impedance in lines, adapted lines, and lines with a stub in parallele (Short circuit).

I understood how to get Zin using the chart, first calculate reduced impedance, draw the circle, etc...

Now I have a question regarding this, and hopefully someone can clarify this.

If we have leakage/loss (γ=α+jβ and α non null) I have been told that I need to calculate how much loss in db/λ I have and then translate the old zin (reduced Zin) vertically by this same amount in oder to get the new zin, is this correct?

Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
anorlunda said:
ping @sophiecentaur . Another spring cleaning thread.
I think the Smith Chart is more convenient to use for lossless lines. I should imagine that the way to deal with a lossy line would be to take a number of short sections of line with lumped components added to give an equivalent value for the loss in each section of line. (using the sort of method that the OP describes, adding an appropriate Impedance or Admittance then rotating the chart by a small phase angle (That would need to be less than λ/8). This would produce a spiral of points, heading towards the centre of the chart.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Thanks Sophie, that us the last of the EE spring cleaning threads.
 
anorlunda said:
Thanks Sophie, that us the last of the EE spring cleaning threads.
My answer was a pragmatic one for someone who wants to use the Smith Chart. It would be easier to use other numerical methods these days. The Smith Chart was a great tool and it is still a great way of showing graphically / qualitatively how matching stubs etc. work. It will show, approximately (and understandably) the effect of losses and it teaches 'the student' about hopping from impedance into admittance and back again in a way that I couldn't begin to replace. I only ever used it in that way - with easy values - but I had a colleague who was dynamite with the chart. AND he used it to produce things that WORKED.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
25K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K